2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of EUCAST, CLSI and USCAST ceftaroline breakpoint changes on the susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from US medical centres (2015–2018)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data confirmed discrepancies in EUCAST disk diffusion assays compared to MIC determination (both with broth microdilution or a MIC test strip) as reported before [ 19 ], and further suggested the need of a revision of disk diffusion criteria. Overall, ceftaroline resistance rates in our collection were very low and comparable to other surveillance studies on MRSA and ceftaroline [ 13 , 20 , 21 ]. This trend derived also from the recent breakpoint changes made in 2019 [ 21 , 22 ] that established higher MIC breakpoints for ceftaroline resistance interpretation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data confirmed discrepancies in EUCAST disk diffusion assays compared to MIC determination (both with broth microdilution or a MIC test strip) as reported before [ 19 ], and further suggested the need of a revision of disk diffusion criteria. Overall, ceftaroline resistance rates in our collection were very low and comparable to other surveillance studies on MRSA and ceftaroline [ 13 , 20 , 21 ]. This trend derived also from the recent breakpoint changes made in 2019 [ 21 , 22 ] that established higher MIC breakpoints for ceftaroline resistance interpretation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Overall, ceftaroline resistance rates in our collection were very low and comparable to other surveillance studies on MRSA and ceftaroline [ 13 , 20 , 21 ]. This trend derived also from the recent breakpoint changes made in 2019 [ 21 , 22 ] that established higher MIC breakpoints for ceftaroline resistance interpretation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results above also suggest the presence of a high level of resistance to clindamycin, tetracycline, and erythromycin, which are antimicrobial agents classified among the most important in veterinary medicine, especially tetracycline [67]. L. monocytogenes, from the results in Table 5, remains susceptible to the first drugs of choice in the treatment of Listeriosis as prescribed by CLSI guidelines [32]. However, limited studies have recorded high levels of L. monocytogenes resistance to clindamycin, especially from food isolates [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…only include a few antimicrobial agents such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, imipenem, and penicillin; therefore, we used CLSI breakpoints for Streptococcus pneumoniae for other antimicrobial agents, and this was because the CLSI guidelines indicated that this was the organism used to interpret breakpoints for L. monocytogenes [32]. The identical 23 isolates and antibiotics had their antimicrobial susceptibility tested using the Etest (Biomerieux) with vancomycin and imipenem because there was no interpretation provided under disc diffusion in the CLSI [32]. The quality control strains included were L. monocytogenes ATCC 19118, Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923.…”
Section: Phenotypic Detection Of Antimicrobial Resistance In Listeria...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation