2012
DOI: 10.1109/led.2011.2182603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Fin Doping and Gate Stack on FinFET (110) and (100) Electron and Hole Mobilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as-drawn fin-width is reduced to 70 nm. The presence of a hard mask on the top of the fin ensured double-gate instead of a trigate operation [5], [7]. The undoped Si layer that underlies the SiGe effectively decouples the device channel from the buried oxide [5], [7], consistent with the radiation response we report below.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…as-drawn fin-width is reduced to 70 nm. The presence of a hard mask on the top of the fin ensured double-gate instead of a trigate operation [5], [7]. The undoped Si layer that underlies the SiGe effectively decouples the device channel from the buried oxide [5], [7], consistent with the radiation response we report below.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The presence of a hard mask on the top of the fin ensured double-gate instead of a trigate operation [5], [7]. The undoped Si layer that underlies the SiGe effectively decouples the device channel from the buried oxide [5], [7], consistent with the radiation response we report below. Unlidded devices were irradiated at a dose rate of 31.5 krad( )/min using a 10 keV ARACOR x-ray source, under positive, negative, and 0 V gate bias, with other terminals grounded, at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 of Ref. [4]) the measured 20 % decrease and 100 % mobility increase in N -type and P -type FinFETs [3,21], respectively, when the (100)/ 100 sidewall/channel configuration is rotated by 45 • around the wafer normal.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…INFET (fin-type field-effect transistor) has emerged as one of the best substitutes for planar MOSFET technology to enable further CMOS scaling. As shown in Fig.1, the FinFET device structure consists of a thin fin-shaped silicon body surrounded by shorted or independent gates on either side of the fin, constructed on SOI (silicon-on-insulator) [1]- [3] or bulk substrates [4], [5]. The FinFET device offers the following advantages [6]: 1) As the fin silicon body is generally thin enough with the thickness of the fin, denoted by T si , smaller than the channel length, denoted by L g , the gate electrode of the FinFET device has superior control over the channel, thereby suppressing the short-channel effects and leading to reduced subthreshold leakage, steeper subthreshold swing, and a higher I on /I off ratio; 2) As the thin silicon body of the FinFET device is typically undoped or lightly doped, the carrier mobility is thus enhanced with ionized dopant scattering eliminated, and the device variations due to random dopant fluctuation (RDF) are reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%