2007
DOI: 10.1177/112067210701700313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Intraocular Pressure after Filtration Surgery on Visual Field Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Abstract: Glaucomatous disease progression is less frequent when IOP is less than or equal to 16 mmHg in all the follow-up visits after trabeculectomy. The results indicate a definite benefit of low IOP in visual field control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,5,19,20 In our study, although we did not conclude a specific IOP the trend test supported the idea that patients with lower early postoperative IOP would have a higher probability to success regardless of the criteria. In addition, IOP exhibited increasing importance in guiding the interventions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…3,5,19,20 In our study, although we did not conclude a specific IOP the trend test supported the idea that patients with lower early postoperative IOP would have a higher probability to success regardless of the criteria. In addition, IOP exhibited increasing importance in guiding the interventions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Lowering the IOP of patients with glaucoma has been shown to reduce the risk of progression and also to delay the onset of progression [21 ]. Visual field progression was less frequent in posttrabeculectomy patients with lower IOP than in those with higher IOP [23]. These studies validate the general consensus that glaucoma progression can be reduced, at least in some patients, by treatments that reduce IOP.…”
Section: Intraocular Pressurementioning
confidence: 65%
“…The most important reason why studies did not meet the high quality criteria was their retrospective design (38.3% of studies reviewed). 10,[30][31][32]34,36,38,39,43,48,53,58,59,61,64,[66][67][68][69] In retrospective studies (historical cohorts), the information contained in the registries may be missing (incomplete) or of poor quality (information bias). 16 In contrast, in retrospective studies, progression and exposure to PFs occurs before the actual start of the research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%