1976
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(76)90014-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of moisture relationships on the management of Pinus pinaster ait. Plantations in Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Butcher (1977) found soil moisture to be the most limiting factor affecting growth in Australian Pinus pinaster plantations. This reinforces our results, which may be useful for developing management operations in places where this species is not considered autochthonous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Butcher (1977) found soil moisture to be the most limiting factor affecting growth in Australian Pinus pinaster plantations. This reinforces our results, which may be useful for developing management operations in places where this species is not considered autochthonous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We might expect that P. pinaster, a species with long-lived foliage, will ultimately be more productive in this habitat, not through greater carbon gain, but via a suite of traits which enables it to survive (see also Chapin 1980). For example, the greater drought tolerance of P. pinaster (Hopkins 1971;Butcher 1977) enables almost 100% survival at this site for which there are reports of substantial drought deaths in P. radiata stands (J. McGrath, unpublished work).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are important commercial timber species and are widely planted in monoculture outside their native range. In Western Australia, P. radiata generally exhibits faster growth than P. pinaster (Butcher 1977). Despite its slower growth P. pinaster is favoured for planting in areas of low rainfall (<750 mm) because of a supposed greater drought resistance (Hopkins 1971) and tolerance of infertile sands (Butcher 1977).…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the expectation that thinning would increase the availability of soil water to individual trees (e.g. Butcher 1977;Aussenac and Granier 1988), thereby reducing drought stress [i.e. Ψ (Whitehead et al 1984;Aussenac and Granier 1988;Bréda et al 1995)], WUE (Lauteri et al 1997) and δ 13 C. Thinning also frequently increases interception of radiation and foliar nutrient concentrations, and these might be expected to increase WUE (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%