2017
DOI: 10.1080/1177083x.2017.1367313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of municipal amalgamation on stakeholder collaboration: the case of Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract: Local councils governing Auckland, New Zealand, underwent restructuring in 2010, amalgamating eight local authorities and establishing the Auckland Council as a unitary authority. Key objectives for Auckland's amalgamation included achieving reform and a single direction in governance, facilitating democratic representation of local communities, overcoming prevalent problems of fragmentation in governance and addressing lack of engagement from local communities. Qualitative interviews with key public and priva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(RQ 1) What sectors in public services have implemented collaborative governance? (Zubair et al, 2017), (Ward et al, 2018), (Thiarai et al, 2019), (Scott & Gilson, 2017), (Bekker et al, 2018), (Moscou & Kohler, 2017), (Kamugumya & Olivier, 2016), (Kim, 2015), (Jobson et al, 2017), (Rensburg et al, 2018), (Gifford et al, 2017), (Broom et al, 2016), (Bordier et al, 2018), (Addison et al, 2016), (Nóbrega et al, 2018) (Webster & Cheyne, 2017), (Supromin & Choonhakhlai, 2017), (Papamichail et al, 2018), (Galli et al, 2019), (Fathimath, 2017), (Choi & Robertson, 2018), (Brinks, 2018), (Vilkė et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(RQ 1) What sectors in public services have implemented collaborative governance? (Zubair et al, 2017), (Ward et al, 2018), (Thiarai et al, 2019), (Scott & Gilson, 2017), (Bekker et al, 2018), (Moscou & Kohler, 2017), (Kamugumya & Olivier, 2016), (Kim, 2015), (Jobson et al, 2017), (Rensburg et al, 2018), (Gifford et al, 2017), (Broom et al, 2016), (Bordier et al, 2018), (Addison et al, 2016), (Nóbrega et al, 2018) (Webster & Cheyne, 2017), (Supromin & Choonhakhlai, 2017), (Papamichail et al, 2018), (Galli et al, 2019), (Fathimath, 2017), (Choi & Robertson, 2018), (Brinks, 2018), (Vilkė et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( (Webster & Cheyne, 2017), (Ward et al, 2018), (Thiarai et al, 2019), (Tefera et al, 2019), (Supromin & Choonhakhlai, 2017), (Scott & Gilson, 2017), (Pettersson, 2017), (Papamichail et al, 2018), (Moscou & Kohler, 2017), (Kim, 2015), (Jobson et al, 2017), (Gifford et al, 2017), (Fathimath, 2017), (Wijs et al, 2016), (Brinks, 2018), (Vilkė et al, 2018), (Bekker et al, 2018).…”
Section: Education Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharing of Resources Among Stakeholders: The potential impacts of collaborative partnerships in the tourism sector are manifold because tourist destinations are fragmented in which a variety of stakeholders vary in size and functions are connected in numerous dynamic ways (Fathimath, 2015). Ngo, Lohmann, and Hales (2018), posit that collaborative tourism governance has been touted as a crucial strategy for achieving tourism performance.…”
Section: Impact Of the Current Partnerships On The Performance Of Tou...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted that the innumerable benefits that tourism brings to a given destination have prompted many players in the industry to partner to improve their performance. Fathimath (2015) conducted a study on the role of stakeholder collaboration in sustainable tourism competitiveness in Auckland, New Zealand. He established that collaboration has a positive impact on facilitating sharing of resources.…”
Section: Impact Of the Current Partnerships On The Performance Of Tou...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visitors' satisfaction can lead destinations to long term success and at the same time, it brings benefits for stakeholders, industry, visitors and local communities. (Fathimath, 2017). Many researchers describe the outcomes of customers satisfaction which are a) word of mouth, b) costumers' complaining behavior, c) brand loyalty, d) continuance, e) recommendation, and f) repurchase intention/repeat visitation (Thusyanthy and Tharanikaran, 2017; Survicate, 2020; Gounaris, Dimitriadis and Stathakopoulos, 2010; Wang, Y.…”
Section: Destination Management Organizations and Touristmentioning
confidence: 99%