2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of ozonation and biological activated carbon filtration on ceramic membrane fouling

Abstract: Ozone pre-treatment (ozonation, ozonisation) and biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration pre-treatment for the ceramic microfiltration (CMF) treatment of secondary effluent (SE) were studied. Ozone pre-treatment was found to result in higher overall removal of UV absorbance (UVA) and colour, and higher permeability than BAC pre-treatment or the combined use of ozone and BAC (O3+BAC) pre-treatment. The overall removal of colour and UVA by ceramic filtration of the ozone pre-treated water was 97% and 63% re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical application for GAC is as a substrate for biological media, in a treatment process known as biological activated carbon (BAC). Recent research has explored its benefits in a water treatment train following oxidation where a BAC stage enhanced the downstream performance of membrane filtration [36,37].…”
Section: Granular Ac (Gac)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical application for GAC is as a substrate for biological media, in a treatment process known as biological activated carbon (BAC). Recent research has explored its benefits in a water treatment train following oxidation where a BAC stage enhanced the downstream performance of membrane filtration [36,37].…”
Section: Granular Ac (Gac)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the addition activated carbone applied in ceramic membrane production [5][6]. The size particle also effect from ceramic membrane as filtration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceramic membranes are used increasingly in water and wastewater treatment due to their inherent advantages over conventional polymeric membranes such as narrow and well-defined pore size distribution, high surface hydrophilicity, and good mechanical and chemical stability [ 1 ]. Although the capital cost for the application of ceramic membranes is still higher than polymeric membranes, the longer lifespan and the ability of ceramic membranes to pair with a wider range of pre-treatment approaches have made them an effective alternative technology to compensate for the higher cost [ 2 ]. However, membrane fouling due to the presence of naturally-occurring aquatic organic matter in source waters is a major challenge in the application/operation of both conventional polymeric and ceramic membranes [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%