2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-015-9933-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of prior azacitidine on the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome

Abstract: To clarify the clinical impact of prior use of azacitidine (AZA) on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 15 MDS patients who were treated with AZA before allo-HSCT (AZA group). We compared the outcomes of these 15 patients with 52 MDS patients who were solely given the best supportive care (BSC) before allo-HSCT (BSC group). Although patients in the AZA group were older with higher Int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of azacitidine before allo-SCT for MDS has been evaluated in a retrospective study, comparing the outcome of 15 MDS patients treated with azacitidine before allo-SCT to that of 52 patients who received BSC only [8]. No significant differences in OS, disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), or nonrelapse mortality were observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of azacitidine before allo-SCT for MDS has been evaluated in a retrospective study, comparing the outcome of 15 MDS patients treated with azacitidine before allo-SCT to that of 52 patients who received BSC only [8]. No significant differences in OS, disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), or nonrelapse mortality were observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voso et al also found that AZA treatment before transplantation was beneficial if patients reached CR [38]. While no significant difference was found between pre-SCT AZA responders and non-responders in OS and RFS in another research [23]. There were also researches claimed that pretransplantation therapy may favor the selection of resistant clones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Among them, the excluded studies were used as meeting summaries, and 28 were excluded. Because of insufficient data or irrelevant results, the final 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 retrospectively reviewed clinical outcome of 15 MDS patients who were treated with AZA before allo-SCT (AZA group) compared with 52MDS patients who were solely given the best supportive care (BSC) before allo-SCT (BSC group). Although patients in the AZA group were older with higher IPSS scores compared to patients in the BSC group, no significant differences were found between the two groups in OS; 79.0 and 78.6%, disease-free survival (DFS); 71.2 and 59.2%, cumulative incidence of relapse; 15.4 and 11.3% or non-relapse mortality; 21.0 and 13.5%, at 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%