2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-4525-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of rainfall spatial aggregation on the identification of debris flow occurrence thresholds

Abstract: Abstract. The systematic underestimation observed in debris flow early warning thresholds has been associated with the use of sparse rain gauge networks to represent highly non-stationary rainfall fields. Remote sensing products permit concurrent estimates of debris-flow-triggering rainfall for areas poorly covered by rain gauges, but the impact of using coarse spatial resolutions to represent such rainfall fields is still to be assessed. This study uses fine-resolution radar data for ∼ 100 debris flows in the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the high spatial variability of rainfall at scales smaller than 5 km (e.g., Krajewski et al, 2003;Ciach and Krajewski, 2006) and the limited density of operational rain gauge networks, the rainfall intensity observed by rain gauges systematically underestimates the actual triggering rainfall intensity at debris flow initiation locations (Marra et al, 2016), especially for short rain duration and high return period . This issue has been shown to significantly affect the obtained ID thresholds for debris flow initiation (Nikolopoulos et al, 2015;Marra et al, 2017). Additionally, different methods adopted to define the dry period separating rain events have been shown to strongly affect the ID threshold (e.g., Vessia et al, 2014;Melillo et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the high spatial variability of rainfall at scales smaller than 5 km (e.g., Krajewski et al, 2003;Ciach and Krajewski, 2006) and the limited density of operational rain gauge networks, the rainfall intensity observed by rain gauges systematically underestimates the actual triggering rainfall intensity at debris flow initiation locations (Marra et al, 2016), especially for short rain duration and high return period . This issue has been shown to significantly affect the obtained ID thresholds for debris flow initiation (Nikolopoulos et al, 2015;Marra et al, 2017). Additionally, different methods adopted to define the dry period separating rain events have been shown to strongly affect the ID threshold (e.g., Vessia et al, 2014;Melillo et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, available rain gauges are usually far from the sites of interest, and located at either different elevations or aspects. Uncertainty in rainfall estimation has a strong impact on the identification of the triggering rainfall [66,67]. Still, information regarding activation dates is commonly incomplete or poorly accurate [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work is focused on precipitation as its distribution, characteristics, and trend have a great influence as triggering factors for hazard [3,30]. They can represent limiting factors for biological community [31] and they can affect human fruition of the higher areas [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%