2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Spaceflight and Artificial Gravity on the Mouse Retina: Biochemical and Proteomic Analysis

Abstract: Astronauts are reported to have experienced some impairment in visual acuity during their mission on the International Space Station (ISS) and after they returned to Earth. There is emerging evidence that changes in vision may involve alterations in ocular structure and function. To investigate possible mechanisms, changes in protein expression profiles and oxidative stress-associated apoptosis were examined in mouse ocular tissue after spaceflight. Nine-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (n = 12) were launched from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…60,78 CONCLUSION In summary, novel and unique neuro-ophthalmic findings have been documented in astronauts during and after LDSF and have been termed SANS. Although a single unifying and overreaching mechanism has yet to be proven, 1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][9]19,40,41,44,[55][56][57] and a multifactorial pathogenesis may be involved, it is likely that SANS may be the end result of cephalad fluid shifts to the brain and orbit brought about by extended MG exposure. Mao et al reviewed the impact of spaceflight and artificial gravity in a mouse retinal model using biochemical and proteomic analysis.…”
Section: Oct and Sansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…60,78 CONCLUSION In summary, novel and unique neuro-ophthalmic findings have been documented in astronauts during and after LDSF and have been termed SANS. Although a single unifying and overreaching mechanism has yet to be proven, 1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][9]19,40,41,44,[55][56][57] and a multifactorial pathogenesis may be involved, it is likely that SANS may be the end result of cephalad fluid shifts to the brain and orbit brought about by extended MG exposure. Mao et al reviewed the impact of spaceflight and artificial gravity in a mouse retinal model using biochemical and proteomic analysis.…”
Section: Oct and Sansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader is directed to both our own prior review articles but also the animal and human work performed by the many intramural and extramural NASA related partners working on SANS. [6][7][8][9] Despite the recognition and research related to SANS for many years, several unanswered questions remain: (1) What, if any, is the significance of potential preferential laterality (i.e., right-sided bias) seen in the anatomical changes of SANS? (unpublished data, personal communication WT); (2) Are there changes in the eye's anterior segment (in addition to the posterior segment findings) associated with SANS?…”
Section: Oct and Sansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, the Japanese Space Agency performed important experiments with a newly developed flight hardware system supporting singly-housed mice, which can be centrifuged at 1 g to replace Earth's gravity level while on the ISS 12 . Findings from their experiments reveal that 1 g artificial gravity mitigates the expected bone loss and muscle atrophy 12 as well as retinal changes 13 that occur after long duration microgravity. Each of the various flight hardware systems developed for long duration spaceflight has unique features, which have the potential to influence results obtained ( Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the literature [59][60][61][62], we expected gene expression changes associated with apoptosis. Indeed, although the experimental treatment was brief, CFLAR, a factor that protects against apoptosis [63], was found up-regulated in HMEC-1 cells upon hypergravity, our result being coherent with data from other cell types [27,64,65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%