2016
DOI: 10.1109/lmwc.2015.2505641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Trapping Effects on the Recovery Time of GaN Based Low Noise Amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buffer layer is intentionally Fe‐doped, as Fe‐doping decreases deep‐acceptor traps and buffer leakages compared to C‐doping. An undoped buffer layer would be a better solution to have low trap densities 33 ; however, the buffer is intentionally doped since it is needed to be highly resistive. A heterostructure is formed by an AlGaN layer of 20 nm to 25 nm thickness on top of the channel GaN layer to create the mismatch to utilize piezoelectric polarization, which forms two‐dimensional electron gas (2DEG) consisting of free electrons with high mobility.…”
Section: Device and Mmic Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Buffer layer is intentionally Fe‐doped, as Fe‐doping decreases deep‐acceptor traps and buffer leakages compared to C‐doping. An undoped buffer layer would be a better solution to have low trap densities 33 ; however, the buffer is intentionally doped since it is needed to be highly resistive. A heterostructure is formed by an AlGaN layer of 20 nm to 25 nm thickness on top of the channel GaN layer to create the mismatch to utilize piezoelectric polarization, which forms two‐dimensional electron gas (2DEG) consisting of free electrons with high mobility.…”
Section: Device and Mmic Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liero et al 22 reported the recovery time for LNA as low as 30 ns with a gain compression of around 8 dB. As explained by Meneghini et al, 32 buffer traps are introduced in Fe-doped AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, and their effect on the recovery time is explored by Axelsson et al 33 They have shown an improvement in RRT in the order of 3 for LNA with undoped GaN buffer compared to LNAs with Fe-doped buffer. The proposed LNA in this work exhibits an RRT value of 20 ms for 34 dB gain compression and less than 27 ns for gain compression less than 12 dB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[50] In addition, the recovery time of the low noise amplifiers is longer for the transistors with Fe-doped buffer than those with unintentionally doped buffer, as a result of the trapping effect of Fe impurities. [51] Furthermore, the Fe impurities in the substrate could easily diffuse into the channel region of the device and have a great influence on the device performance. [52] The unintentionally incorporated impurities are harmful to the performance of GaN-based devices.…”
Section: Progress Of Highly Pure Ganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, semi-insulating GaN is generally obtained by the compensation of background shallow donors (mainly Si and O impurities) by deep level impurities (mainly Fe and C impurities), but heavy doping leads to tremendous disasters in devices. [50][51][52] Learning from the experiences in HPSI GaAs [53] and SiC, [54] HPSI GaN points out a new way to solve the problems above. If we could reduce the concentration of the background shallow donors, the concentration of deep level impurities needed to realize semi-insulating electrical characteristic could decrease correspondingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these measures the survivability of the GaN LNA is very high, but after a high-input overdrive pulse the LNA is changing its performance. The recovery time due to trapping effects can be very long [11]. With a special biasing electronic circuitry (patent-pending) it is possible to reduce the trapping itself and the recovery time to a sufferable level.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%