2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired Efficiency and Resilience of Structural Network in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3

Abstract: Background: Recent studies have shown that the patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) may not only have disease involvement in the cerebellum and brainstem but also in the cerebral regions. However, the relations between the widespread degenerated brain regions remains incompletely explored.Methods: In the present study, we investigate the topological properties of the brain networks of SCA3 patients (n = 40) constructed based on the correlation of three-dimensional fractal dimension values. Random… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Is there any threshold of neurodegeneration beyond which applying tES is not reasonable? (Wu et al, 2018). What would be the realistic expectation after tES?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Is there any threshold of neurodegeneration beyond which applying tES is not reasonable? (Wu et al, 2018). What would be the realistic expectation after tES?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is emerging evidence of network-level dysfunction in many neurological disorders. Movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD) (de Schipper et al, 2018), dystonia (Schirinzi et al, 2018), tremor (Benito-León et al, 2015), and ataxia (Falcon et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2018) may fit very well within this construct of network dysfunction to explain the pathophysiology and phenotypes. This paradigm shift of suggesting that the movement disorders are a result of dysfunction in multilevel, interconnected complex cortico-subcortical network rather than only being restricted to the basal ganglia has opened the possibility of modifying that network noninvasively by delivering electromagnetic stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reorganization and increased inter-modular connectivity of the supratentorial networks may have resulted from the plasticity of the brain in attempting to compensate for function loss in the cerebellum. Moreover, our previous study evidenced that the SCA3 networks were globally more vulnerable to targeted attacks than the normal controls networks because of the effects of pathological topological organization [ 33 ]. The SCA3 analysis revealed a sparser and disrupted structural network with decreased values in the largest component size, mean degree, mean density, clustering coefficient and global efficiency and increased value in characteristic path length [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our previous study evidenced that the SCA3 networks were globally more vulnerable to targeted attacks than the normal controls networks because of the effects of pathological topological organization [ 33 ]. The SCA3 analysis revealed a sparser and disrupted structural network with decreased values in the largest component size, mean degree, mean density, clustering coefficient and global efficiency and increased value in characteristic path length [ 33 ]. While in the present study, we used modular analysis of network, and focused local effect between different lobes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it may provide new information regarding brain physiology as well as enhance neural plasticity in neurodegenerative ataxia and spasticity, without exposing the patients to the risks associated with invasive therapies such as deep brain stimulation [6‐8]. NES is especially promising given the emerging evidence of network‐level disturbances, consequences of degenerative changes in the cerebellum and basal ganglia [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%