2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01801-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
331
4
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 460 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
28
331
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these findings point to a major role of attentional resource allocation on phonological processing. Such attentional deficit might relate to the sluggish attention shifting hypothesis proposed by Hari and Renvall [23]. Further research will determine whether phonological tasks with greater attentional demands allow differences between dyslexic and control adults to emerge, and more importantly, whether attentional demands also affect dyslexic individuals' performance in nonverbal tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Overall, these findings point to a major role of attentional resource allocation on phonological processing. Such attentional deficit might relate to the sluggish attention shifting hypothesis proposed by Hari and Renvall [23]. Further research will determine whether phonological tasks with greater attentional demands allow differences between dyslexic and control adults to emerge, and more importantly, whether attentional demands also affect dyslexic individuals' performance in nonverbal tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The precise nature and causal structure of the relationship between reading and sequential learning (see Hari & Renvall, 2001;Hedenius et al, 2013) remains to be elucidated and, accordingly, we recently conducted a longitudinal study that addressed this issue (Bogaerts et al, submitted). Verbal and visual Hebb repetition learning performance and reading skills were assessed in 96 children (including children at risk of dyslexia) whom we followed from the first through to the second grade of primary school.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our observations regarding cognitive performances of the participants with different patterns of perception and production of T2 and T5 further demonstrate that individual differences in speech processing may be determined by some higher level cognitive function, such as attention switching/shifting (Hari & Renvall, 2001;Lallier et al, 2010). Specifically, individuals' abilities to switch their attentional focus in the visual modality (measured with VE1 and VE2) can account for differences in behavioral discrimination sensitivity (d′).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%