2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-006-0547-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired working speed and executive functions as frontal lobe dysfunctions in young first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results are in striking contrast to the majority of previous reports [19,20,21], where cognitive impairment is observed in both schizophrenia patients and their relatives. However, the current study is not unique in this regard since negative results of such comparisons have also been reported for executive functions [24,25] and other cognitive tests, e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such results are in striking contrast to the majority of previous reports [19,20,21], where cognitive impairment is observed in both schizophrenia patients and their relatives. However, the current study is not unique in this regard since negative results of such comparisons have also been reported for executive functions [24,25] and other cognitive tests, e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Several cognitive endophenotypes fulfilling the above criteria have been proposed [19,20,21,22]. A meta-analysis of 37 studies shows that in comparison to healthy controls, relatives of schizophrenic patients display deficits in verbal memory, executive functions and attention [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some studies of cognitive function among relatives of persons with schizophrenia have shown subtle impairments in cognitive flexibility and abstraction/concept formation, it is possible that the impairment in these constructs reflects, in part, vulnerability to the condition. 37,38 To summarize our findings, rather than speaking of executive functions generically and as a homogeneous construct, at least within the context of describing the neurocognitive characteristics of schizophrenia, the present study provides empirical grounding for distinguishing between the constructs of cognitive flexibility and abstraction. This study sheds light on the importance of including measures of cognitive flexibility along with those of abstraction in a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment in schizophrenia and considering the relative strengths and weaknesses within the executive functioning domain to identify targets for rehabilitation planning for patients with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know of previous studies that investigated the development of selective attention using the d2 Test. However, the d2 Test is commonly used in neuropsychological studies of children, among others in studies of the effect of neurofeedback treatment for ADHD (Fuchs, Birbaumer, Lutzenberger, Gruzelier, & Kaiser, 2003), the neuropsychological markers of schizophrenia in adolescents (Klemm, Schmidt, Knappe, & Blanz, 2006;Schreiber, Stolz-Born, Heinrich, Kornhuber, & Born, 1992), the neuropsychological effects of irradiation for childhood leukemia (Langer et al, 2002), the remediation of attention deficits (Penkman, 2004), the neuropsychological profiles of children and adolescents with temporal lobe epilepsy (Lendt, Helmstaedter, & Elger, 1999), the neuropsychological profiles of early treated children with phenylketonuria (Weglage et al, 1999;Weglage, Pietsch, Funders, Koch, & Ullrich, 1996), and the influence of methylphenidate on cortical processing of children with ADHD (Wienbruch, Paul, Bauer, & Kivelitz, 2005). Because children who have not learned the difference between the characters "d" and "p" cannot be tested with the d2 Test (Brickenkamp & Zillmer, 1998), we chose to study children in the second (age 7) and higher grades of school in order to be certain that they had sufficient knowledge of the characters used.…”
Section: R Wassenberg Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%