Impairment of Microbial Killing and Superoxide-Producing Activities of Alveolar Macrophages by a Low Level of Ozone.

Abstract

Male Wistar rats were exposed to 0.2 ppm ozone for up to 14 days, during which alveolar macrophages were collected by pulmonary lavage to assess the effect of ozone on their microbial killing and superoxide-producing activities. For rapid assessment of microbial killing activity, we measured the release of 3 H-radioactivity into the supernatant by deoxycholate-lysis of the macrophages that had phagosytosed and killed 3 H-uridine-labeled microbes. The killing activity against Escherichia coli and Candida albicans was reduced to 70-80% of control levels on day 3. However, phagocytosis by and the activity of lysosomal enzymes of the macrophages were not impaired. On day 14 the killing activity against E. coli had returned to control levels, whereas that against C. albicans was still reduced. Because active oxygen species plays an important role in microbial killing activity of macrophages, the effects of ozone on respiratory burst and superoxide production were examined. Aliquots of alveolar macrophages were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), opsonized zymosan, or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) plus cytochalasin E (Cyt.E). The respiratory burst, oxygen consumption for rapid superoxide production, was decreased to 60-80% of control levels on day 3. On day 14, the respiratory burst by opsonized zymosan was still 80% reduced, whereas that by PMA or LPS plus Cyt.E had returned to control levels. In addition, the superoxide-producing activity of ozone-exposed macrophages was 10-60% decreased on day 3. On day 14, the superoxide production by stimulation with opsonized zymosan was still 60% reduced, whereas that by PMA or LPS plus Cyt.E had returned to control levels. In conclusion, because of their decreased production of superoxide, the host defense activity of alveolar macrophages was impaired by in vivo exposure to 0.2 ppm ozone. In particular, the C. albicans-associated defect lasted throughout the exposure period.

Factors determining the diffusion of COVID-19 and suggested strategy to prevent future accelerated viral infectivity similar to COVID

“…Animal and human in-vitro and in-vivo exposure studies have demonstrated the powerful oxidant capacity of inhaled ozone with activation of stress signaling pathways in epithelial cells (Bayram et al, 2001) and resident alveolar inflammatory cells (Mochitate et al, 2001). Lewtas (2007) shows that exposures to combustion emissions and ambient fine particulate air pollution are associated with genetic damages.…”

Two mechanisms for accelerated diffusion of COVID-19 outbreaks in regions with high intensity of population and polluting industrialization: the air pollution-to-human and human-to-human transmission dynamics

“…Air pollutants exert their own specific individual toxic effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems of people; in addition, ozone, oxides of nitrogen, and suspended particulates have a common property of being potent oxidants, either through direct effects on lipids and proteins Coccia M. (2020) Two mechanisms for accelerated diffusion of COVID-19 outbreaks in regions with high intensity of population and polluting industrialization: the air pollution-to-human and human-to-human transmission dynamics or indirectly through the activation intracellular oxidant pathways (Rahman and MacNee, 2000). Animal and human in-vitro and in-vivo exposure studies have demonstrated the powerful oxidant capacity of inhaled ozone with activation of stress signaling pathways in epithelial cells (Bayram et al, 2001) and resident alveolar inflammatory cells (Mochitate et al, 2001). Lewtas (2007) shows in human studies that exposures to combustion emissions and ambient fine particulate air pollution are associated with genetic damages.…”

Ambient Ozone as a Risk Factor for ED Visits for Cellulitis

“…There are cues that exposure to ambient ozone may result in oxidative stress to the skin (Thiele et al, 1997), damaging skin lipids (Camhi et al, 1997;Wisthaler & Weschler, 1995) and keratinocytes (Zuliani et al, 2004), and rendering the skin a conductive environment for colonization by bacteria. Essentially, the oxidative stress would involve disturbing the oxidant-antioxidant balance such that it is advantageous to the microbe (Gibson et al, 1996;Cunningham, 2000), damaging skin cells and impairing skin immunity (Katsumi et al, 2001). The pathogen itself seems to better endure the ozone-induced oxidation: the streptococci are known to be among bacteria that are the most resistant to ozone sanitary oxidizing (US EPA, 1999).…”