2017
DOI: 10.1017/s143192761700109x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Sub-sampling Methods for Low-Dose (Scanning) Transmission Electron Microscopy (S/TEM)

Abstract: In many practical applications of high resolution (scanning) transmission electron microscopy, the resolution obtainable in an image is determined solely by the stability of the sample. This is particularly true in the era of aberration corrected S/TEM where the dose on the sample for the highest resolution images can easily exceed 10 5 electrons/Å 2 during routine operation. This dose sensitivity presents extreme constraints on applications such as 3-D imaging, spectroscopic imaging and in-situ experiments, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the scanning coil will become unstable at extremely short pixel dwell time, and the optics needs to be realigned once the probe current is tuned with beam crossover moved 203. More recently, another low‐dose STEM imaging strategy, compressive sensing (CS) STEM, has drawn a lot of attentions 204,205. Instead of reducing the pixel dwell time, the total number of scanned pixels are dramatically reduced but the information are well recovered from the far undersampled images.…”
Section: Technological and Methodological Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the scanning coil will become unstable at extremely short pixel dwell time, and the optics needs to be realigned once the probe current is tuned with beam crossover moved 203. More recently, another low‐dose STEM imaging strategy, compressive sensing (CS) STEM, has drawn a lot of attentions 204,205. Instead of reducing the pixel dwell time, the total number of scanned pixels are dramatically reduced but the information are well recovered from the far undersampled images.…”
Section: Technological and Methodological Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%