2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications for the Use of Postural Analysis as a Clinical Diagnostic Tool: Reliability of Quantifying Upright Standing Spinal Postures From Photographic Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
66
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…If reliability is low, the validity of the method cannot be determined 23 . The reliability of most angles described in this study has not been evaluated, although they are widely used in scientific studies 11,16,20 . In this respect, using intra-and interobserver assessment, Zonnenberg et al 8 found that photogrammetry provides reliable data and consistent measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If reliability is low, the validity of the method cannot be determined 23 . The reliability of most angles described in this study has not been evaluated, although they are widely used in scientific studies 11,16,20 . In this respect, using intra-and interobserver assessment, Zonnenberg et al 8 found that photogrammetry provides reliable data and consistent measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact may explain the lack of repeatability between measurements. However, Dunk et al 20 found the sagittal view to best reflect the clinical evolution of postural changes since in this view the angular measurements differ from zero, whereas in the frontal view they tend to approach zero (symmetry). The authors also emphasized that the results of photogrammetry are reliable when anatomical landmarks are used instead of an external vertical reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present findings are consistent with those reported by other authors who assessed the angle of kyphosis and lordosis using photogrammetry and imaging technique applying X-rays. When they compared photogrammetry results with X-ray images these authors found positive correspondence in the case of thoracic kyphosis angle, yet measurement of angle of lordosis with photogrammetric method carried significant error [27,28]. Different findings related to measurement of lumbar lordosis were shown by Drzał-Grabiec et al, who reported that these two methods produced consistent results, yet the angular values identified with the non-invasive method were lower [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This method of photographic analysis has been shown to have good reliability for the analysis of sagittal plane spinal posture and mobility. 3,24 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%