1993
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit serial learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
116
2
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
116
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only when the animated diagram was used to enhance learning was knowledge of chunk positions well learned. We do not deny that true bottom-up learning (i.e., in an upward direction) can occur implicitly; this has been well demonstrated, for example, in serial pattern learning, where participants learn about regularities in sequences of stimuli over trials (Stadler, 1993). However, our data suggest that the experience-based learning system is more efficient for learning about structure within units, rather than between nominal stimuli (e.g., chunk position).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Only when the animated diagram was used to enhance learning was knowledge of chunk positions well learned. We do not deny that true bottom-up learning (i.e., in an upward direction) can occur implicitly; this has been well demonstrated, for example, in serial pattern learning, where participants learn about regularities in sequences of stimuli over trials (Stadler, 1993). However, our data suggest that the experience-based learning system is more efficient for learning about structure within units, rather than between nominal stimuli (e.g., chunk position).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Theories differ in the extent to which learning of sequence information is mediated by conscious application of rules about the grammatical structure of the sequence, by implicit processes involved in learning associations between elements in the sequence, or by exemplar-based memory retrieval processes. In particular, the role of exemplar-based memory processes in sequence learning has been thoroughly documented in the context of artificial grammar learning (for a review, see Neal & Hesketh, 1997), and has been suggested in the context of the serial reaction time (SRT) paradigm (Stadler, 1992(Stadler, , 1993(Stadler, , 1995. More recently, computational accounts of the exemplar approach have been proposed both in the domain of artificial grammar learning (Jamieson & Mewhort, 2009a), and in the SRT domain (Jamieson & Mewhort, 2009b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the latter, the available evidence (Hebb, 1961;McKelvie, 1987) indicates that explicit knowledge of the list repetition is not necessary for a recall advantage to obtain, a finding that suggests a link between the Hebb repetition effect and the larger literature on so-called implicit serial learning (ISL). Surprisingly, however, only Stadler (1993) has explored the connection in any depth (in addition to providing a useful review). He studied implicit serial learning in the context of a serial reaction time task, modified by the introduction of nonrepeating filler sequences to make it more like the paradigm used by Hebb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Stadler's (1993) work suggests a link between ISL and the Hebb repetition effect, some caution is necessary. Tests of the Hebb repetition effect involve explicit attempts to perform immediate serial recall of a relatively small Hebb repetition learning 4 number of lists, with regular repetitions of (usually) a single list separated by the recall of nonrepeating fillers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%