Impoliteness in polylogal interaction: Accounting for face-threat witnesses’ responses

Dobs, Abby Mueller; Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos

doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.002

Cited by 99 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Penelitian mengenai strategi kesantunan, sejauh ini sudah banyak dikaji oleh berbagai peneliti, baik dalam lingkup lokal, nasional, bahkan internasional, namun belum ada penelitian yang membahas kesantunan negatif tindak tutur direktif masyarakat Indonesia. Adapun penelitian mengenai kesantunan yang sudah dikaji di antaranya; Kesantunan Melayu Maros (2011) kesantunan dan ketidaksantunan dalam New Zealand English (Holmes, Marra, & Vine, 2012), kesantunan guru (Sugini, Djatmika, & Maryadi (2016) formula ketidaksantunan (Culpeper, 2010: Dobs & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 2013, dan penerjemahan penanda kesantunan perintah dari bahasa Inggris ke bahasa Indonesia (Ardi, Nababan, Djatmika, Santosa, 2018). Penelitian-penelitian yang sudah dilakukan itu belum ada yang mengaitkan antara kesantunan muka negatif dan tindak tutur direktif di media twitter, khususnya masyarakat Indonesia.…”

Section: A Pendahuluanunclassified

Strategi Kesantunan Negatif Tindak Tutur Direktif Masyarakat Indonesia Dalam Akun Twitter Presiden Joko Widodo

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to describe negative politeness strategy of Indonesians in President Joko Widodo's twitter account. The type of this research is qualitative descriptive with pragmatic approach. The data source of this research is President Joko Widodo's twitter on September 2016 focusing on law topic. The data of this research is lingual data as speach act realization in written form. The technique of collecting data uses purposive sampling technique. The analysis model is based on two approaches, which are linguistic approach by Sudaryanto and etnography by Spradley which are domain, taxonomy, componential and cultural themes. There are six negative politeness strategies as this research finding, including indirect strategy, asking strategy, face thre straightforward strategy in which each is realized in directive speech act.

show abstract

Section: A Pendahuluanunclassified

Strategi Kesantunan Negatif Tindak Tutur Direktif Masyarakat Indonesia Dalam Akun Twitter Presiden Joko Widodo

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Brought to you by | New York University Bobst Library Technical Services Authenticated Download Date | 7/4/15 7:44 AM primarily in the context of media discourse and computer-mediated communication (Lorenzo-Dus et al 2011;Dobs and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich 2013;BouFranch and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich 2014).…”

Section: Notions Related To Impolitenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…; Bousfield 2007a) -legal discourse(Archer 2008; Harris 2011) -classroom discourse(Cashman 2006;Dobs and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich 2013) -talk in the workplace(Schnurr et al 2008;Mullany 2008Mullany , 2011 -institutional discourse(Taylor 2011) Lorenzo-Dus 2007Kienpointner 2008;Tracy 2008, Gar- cés-Conejos Blitvich 2009, Dynel 2011a) -(exploitative) quiz and talent shows(Culpeper 2005; Garcés-Conejos Blit- vich et al 2010Lorenzo-Dus et al 2013;Culpeper and Holmes 2013) -films and drama…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The landscape of impoliteness research

Dynel¹

2015

Journal of Politeness Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article attempts to give a state-of-the-art picture of impoliteness studies and to indicate a few prospective research directions to enrich them. It critically surveys a number of theoretical and methodological problems (impoliteness vs. rudeness; intention; sanctioned face-threat; and impoliteness strategies), as well as the paramount topics of investigation (such as disagreement; arguments; insults, taboo words; or sarcasm), and discourse domains in which impoliteness can be found. Importantly, this paper brings to focus a selection of notions central to impoliteness, albeit not yet widely recognized in the scholarship on impoliteness. These include: slurs; pejoratives; and a number of phenomena promoted by computer mediated communication (e.g., flaming or trolling).

show abstract

“…Although this constructive dimension of antagonism has been addressed by some researchers (e.g. Dobs and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich 2013;Graham 2007;Neurauter-Kessels 2011;Upadhyay 2010), it still remains somewhat underexplored in the literature. This paper is divided into three main sections.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Face effects of verbal antagonism in online discussions

Hopkinson¹

2014

BSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on a corpus of internet discussions on medical topics, this study examines a salient characteristic of the genre -the prevalence of aggressive verbal antagonism. Drawing on concepts of face, rapport management and relational work, I argue that the effects of verbally aggressive behaviour in this genre are not only destructive and anti-social, but also perform a constructive function, offering benefits both to individual speakers and to the discourse community as a whole. The analysis shows how speakers target different aspects of their opponents' face, deploying a range of face attack strategies (moves). The study then seeks to demonstrate how aggressive facework can help speakers construct and enhance their own face, as well as functioning as a stimulus to constructive relational work among participants.

show abstract

Impoliteness in polylogal interaction: Accounting for face-threat witnesses’ responses

Cited by 99 publications

References 33 publications

Strategi Kesantunan Negatif Tindak Tutur Direktif Masyarakat Indonesia Dalam Akun Twitter Presiden Joko Widodo

Strategi Kesantunan Negatif Tindak Tutur Direktif Masyarakat Indonesia Dalam Akun Twitter Presiden Joko Widodo

The landscape of impoliteness research

Face effects of verbal antagonism in online discussions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About