“…Such a higher complexity of the signature for the dinucleotide-binding motif makes it possible to discriminate more precisely between the three isoforms: (i) the hexapeptide GAGNVA is found for GDH4 from Viridiplantae ; (ii) the hexapeptide GSGNVA is the signature for GDH4 from not Viridiplantae (subset G). The finding of the same motif for subsets G, I2 and I3, together with high percentage of identity between them (86% between G and I2, 70% between G and I3), suggest that GDHs not EC classified from subsets I2 and I3 are also GDH4; (iii) the hexapeptides GFGNVG or GFGNAG are found for subsets A, D, H ( Viridiplantae ) and for subsets B, E, I1 ( not Viridiplantae ); (iv) a very different heptapeptide G(Q) [V/T] [D/G] [M/P] [S/D]G, sharing the first and the third conserved Gly, is found for large GDHsfrom subsets C, K and L. The K m NADPH values for the wild-type GDH4 from Salmonella typhimurium and for the mutant GDH K 286 E are 9.8 μM and 280 μM, respectively [23]. This indicates that the side chain of the equivalent Lys residue for plant GDH4 (Lys 360 of Ref , Fig.…”