2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40663-020-00256-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of overstorey attributes for understorey litter production and nutrient cycling in European forests

Abstract: Background: In contrast with the negligible contribution of the forest understorey to the total aboveground phytobiomass of a forest, its share in annual litter production and nutrient cycling may be more important. Whether and how this functional role of the understorey differs across forest types and depends upon overstorey characteristics remains to be investigated. Methods: We sampled 209 plots of the FunDivEUROPE Exploratory Platform, a network of study plots covering local gradients of tree diversity spr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.2 ). The loss of forests and other natural or semi-natural vegetation cover due to agricultural practices increases photodegradation of surface litter [ 19 , 397 ], such that deforestation and land clearing will accelerate release of carbon from the ecosystem and alter patterns of GHG emissions and nutrient cycling [ 395 , 402 , 415 , 416 ]. In dryland ecosystems, litter position (e.g.…”
Section: Effects On Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2 ). The loss of forests and other natural or semi-natural vegetation cover due to agricultural practices increases photodegradation of surface litter [ 19 , 397 ], such that deforestation and land clearing will accelerate release of carbon from the ecosystem and alter patterns of GHG emissions and nutrient cycling [ 395 , 402 , 415 , 416 ]. In dryland ecosystems, litter position (e.g.…”
Section: Effects On Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each region (Table S4), the ecological indicator system was selected with the application region corresponding or closest by that study region (Bita-Nicolae and Sanda, 2011; Ellenberg et al, 1992;Mayor López, 1999;Pignatti, 2005;Zarzycki et al, 2002). Three subplots (5 m × 5 m) were established for the survey of understory communities in three of the nine quadrants (upper right, central and lower left) (Landuyt et al, 2020). Species cover of all vascular plant species was estimated in each subplot and used to calculate a stand-level weighted average of species indicator values (i.e.…”
Section: Aboveground and Belowground Resource Availability And Uptake Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%