Important places in landscape – investigating the determinants of perceived landscape value in the suburban area of Wrocław, Poland

Solecka, Iga; Rinne, Tiina; Martins, Rodrigo Caracciolo; Kyttä, Marketta; Albert, Christian

doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104289

Cited by 18 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…People's perception of landscape leads to a better understanding of the necessity of nature protection and landscape preservation (Gobster et al, 2007;Jovanovska et al, 2020;Pueyo-Ros, Ribas, & Fraguell, 2018). When talking about landscape quality not always it is perceived as a visually appealing landscape, because most of the landscapes that provide a wide range of ES are natural, not managed (Wartmann et al, 2021), and even not accessible, when asking people's opinion about visually appealing landscape, results can be quite opposite compared with biophysical evaluation; for example, a road in a landscape is evaluated as negative aspect for visual landscape quality by biophysical evaluation, but from people perspective that is not the case, because the same road can provide accessibility to landscape (Solecka et al, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…and personal or cognitive perception, but there are still discussions on which approach is more accurate to evaluate visual landscape quality (Jovanovska et al, 2020;Price, 2013) or how to quantify landscape quality in general (Swetnam, Harrison-Curran, & Smith, 2017). People's understanding of landscape quality varies from the perception of visual or sensual qualities to the overall understanding of ecological processes, history and culture that affects landscape character and our personal feelings towards specific landscape (cognitive perception) (Gottero, Cassatella, & Larcher, 2021;Solecka et al, 2022;Swetnam, Harrison-Curran, & Smith, 2017;Wartmann et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Research for Rural Development 2022 : annual 28th International scientific conference proceedings

Gaile¹

2022

Research for Rural Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this work was to study the behavior, productivity and conditions of second lactation Bos taurus during the period of adaptation to new keeping and milking conditions. Thirty-four cows of the local black-and-white breed of the second lactation (24-47 days after calving) were transferred from a brick barn for 100 heads with tie-stall keeping in a newly low cost housing facility for 400 heads with free-stall keeping. Milking equipment also changed: before the changing conditions of keeping, cows were milked in the milk duct at UDM-100, and after changing the conditions in the milking parlor at Carousel, 32 cows were milked at the same time. We divided the first 30 days in the new conditions of keeping and milking into VI periods. The duration of the main behavioral reactions: lying down, drinking, and eating food in the first days after changing the conditions of keeping and milking decreased significantly -by 181; 13 and 89 min, respectively. Behavioral responses at the end of the adaptation period (30 days) was lower than on the last day before changing housing and milking conditions. During the first 5 days after the change of housing and milking conditions, the average productivity of cows decreased by 1.39 kg (or 6.01%), content of milk fat, protein and lactose by 0.03; 0.02 and 0.04%, respectively compared to the last day before the transfer of animals. As for the fat content, the level of the indicator of the last day before the cows transfer was reached in the IV period; protein and lactose in the ІІІ period (11-15 days).

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research for Rural Development 2022 : annual 28th International scientific conference proceedings

Gaile¹

2022

Research for Rural Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These methods collect and analyze spatial data from places and values in the geographical distribution to provide decision support in planning processes [21]. PPGIS surveys ask users to identify and mark locations on a map and select values based on participants' experiential knowledge according to a typology given [22,28,30,[32][33][34]. However, other methodologies of determining landscape values ask about the values transmitted in pre-identified located points on a territory [26,31,[35][36][37].…”

Section: Methodology Of Investigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The original typology of landscape values was developed by Brown and Reed [20], who established a set of 13 values (aesthetic, recreation, biodiversity, life-supporting, economic, learning, historical, cultural, future, intrinsic, spiritual, therapeutic, subsistence) as part of a forest planning process. This typology has been adapted and used for different applications, such as public lands [21], country management [22][23][24], urban areas [25][26][27][28], rural landscapes [29,30], and coastal landscapes [31,32]. However, there is not a one-to-one correspondence when dealing with places and values [26].…”

Section: Landscape Valuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Landscape Values in a Marina in Granada (Spain): Enhancing Landscape Management through Public Participation

Martín

Piqueras

2023

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Landscape values are related to the attributes that people assign to a perceived landscape. They reflect marina user perceptions, thus representing a feedback tool for marina managers to use to verify the degree of user satisfaction. This study focused on identifying and assessing a marina’s landscape values. We took Marina del Este (Granada, Spain) as a case study. We considered interviews and a questionnaire to devise methods to enhance the participation of stakeholders and users. First, the SWOT analysis from stakeholder interviews enabled us to collect management’s perceptions. Second, the survey gathered the marina’s landscape values, comprising 104 respondents from visitors and users. ANOVA and PCA methods were applied to check the suitability of the values. The results showed that the marina should be in keeping with an atmosphere of tranquility and well-being. Nevertheless, there was a need to improve values related to nautical tourism, such as hospitality and maintenance, dealing with the lack of space and an excess of urbanization in the surroundings. Marina managers should consider these outcomes and analyze the points of improvement to establish the causes of these disagreements and propose solutions for the established management model. The perception of stakeholders and users can enable more consensual policies with greater levels of acceptance and involvement.

show abstract

“…Among them, landscape space aesthetics evaluation methods are mainly based on the quantitative analysis of sites based on remote sensing image data [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], such as environmental simulation prediction models to quantify the aesthetic quality of urban waterfront space [ 42 ] and mobile LiDAR point clouds to draw three-dimensional models of urban street environments [ 43 ]. Psychological and aesthetic evaluation is mainly based on crowd perception [ 44 , 45 ], using public participation, semantic analysis, and other methods to obtain the results of the crowd’s emotional perceptions to determine the value quality of landscape aesthetics [ 46 , 47 ]. For example, social media texts are used to explore the emotional reactions of users to waterfront landscapes [ 48 ], and urban landscape perception research is based on public streetscape images [ 49 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)

Xiao-jia

Chen²,

Huang

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As an important part of urban green infrastructure, the landscape effect of the urban waterfront green space varies, and sometimes, the green space with an excellent landscape aesthetic value fails to serve the needs of most citizens. This seriously affects the construction of a green ecological civilization and the implementation of the concept of “common prosperity” in China. Based on multi-source data, this study took the Qiantang River Basin as an example, selected 12 representative waterfront green spaces along the river as the research objects, and used qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to determine the landscape aesthetic value of the research area from the different dimensions of space, psychology, and physiology. We examined the relationship between each dimension so as to objectively and comprehensively reflect the landscape value characteristics of the waterfront green space in the study area and provide a reasonable theoretical framework and practical development path for future urban waterfront green space landscape design. We obtained the following results: (1) The results of the spatial dimension research indicated that the spatial value index of the waterfront green space in the study area was three-dimensional space > vertical space > horizontal space, and the overall spatial value was low; Qianjiang Ecological Park obtained the highest value (0.5473), and Urban Balcony Park obtained the lowest value (0.4619). (2) The results of the psychological dimension indicated that people’s perceptions of the waterfront green space in the study area were relatively weak, mainly focusing on visual perception, but the waterfront green space with a relative emotional value greater than one accounted for 75%, and the overall recognition of the landscape was high. (3) The results of the behavioral dimension showed that the overall heat of the waterfront green space in the study area was insufficient (1.3719–7.1583), which was mainly concentrated in low-heat levels, and the population density was unevenly distributed (0.0014–0.0663), which was mainly concentrated in the medium-density level. The main purpose of users was to visit, and they stayed an average of 1.5 h. (4) The results of the coupling coordination analysis of the spatial–psychological–behavioral dimensions showed that the landscape value of the waterfront green space in the study area presented a form of ‘high coupling degree and low coordination degree’.

show abstract

Important places in landscape – investigating the determinants of perceived landscape value in the suburban area of Wrocław, Poland

Cited by 18 publications

References 57 publications

Research for Rural Development 2022 : annual 28th International scientific conference proceedings

Research for Rural Development 2022 : annual 28th International scientific conference proceedings

Landscape Values in a Marina in Granada (Spain): Enhancing Landscape Management through Public Participation

Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About