2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2006)132:7(523)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved AADT Estimation by Combining Information in Image- and Ground-Based Traffic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction error is defined as ‫݊݅ݐܿ݅݀݁ݎܲ‬ ‫ݎݎݎܧ‬ ൌ ‫݀݁ݐܿ݅݀݁ݎ‪ȁ‬‬ ‫݁ݑ݈ܽݒ‬ െ ‫݁ݑݎݐ‬ ‫‪݁ȁ‬ݑ݈ܽݒ‬ ‫݁ݑݎݐ‬ ‫݁ݑ݈ܽݒ‬ (7) In the above formula, we let the predicted value be 0 if it is negative. By doing this procedure until the preset accuracy is reached by the L1 norm of the output difference between the current step and the last step, or until the total iteration number reaches a preset limit, say 500 or 1000 times, we can get the median prediction error for different percentiles.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction error is defined as ‫݊݅ݐܿ݅݀݁ݎܲ‬ ‫ݎݎݎܧ‬ ൌ ‫݀݁ݐܿ݅݀݁ݎ‪ȁ‬‬ ‫݁ݑ݈ܽݒ‬ െ ‫݁ݑݎݐ‬ ‫‪݁ȁ‬ݑ݈ܽݒ‬ ‫݁ݑݎݐ‬ ‫݁ݑ݈ܽݒ‬ (7) In the above formula, we let the predicted value be 0 if it is negative. By doing this procedure until the preset accuracy is reached by the L1 norm of the output difference between the current step and the last step, or until the total iteration number reaches a preset limit, say 500 or 1000 times, we can get the median prediction error for different percentiles.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang, McCord and Goel (2006) [7] proposed to utilize weighted information of both imaged-based and ground-based traffic data. Eom, Park, Heo and Hunstiger (2006) [2] took into account both spatial trend (mean) and spatial correlation using the spatial regression model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed an improvement ranging from 10% to 20% over the conventional estimation of the seasonal factors. More recently, Jiang, McCord, and Goel (2006) combined imagery (satellites and air photos) and ground-based data to improve AADT estimates for coverage segments.…”
Section: Current-year Aadt Estimation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang and Davis (2002) used Bayesian techniques for calculating classified mean daily traffic and also analysed the effect of how long a short duration traffic count took. McCord et al (2003) proposed an alternative methodology in which AADT was estimated from a single image of a road segment and, based on this model, Jiang et al (2006) proposed a different approach that exploited existing imagery of highway segments and earlier year coverage counts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%