IEEE 1986 Ultrasonics Symposium 1986
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.1986.198717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Metallization for SAW Filters on LiNbO<inf>3</inf>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor that can affect the HARE-LWR's performance is the damping caused by the electrodes. It was reported that the electrode material can affect the insertion loss of conventional SAW filters [32]. One might question that using HAREs can increase the damping caused by the electrodes and thus decrease the quality factor of the HARE-LWR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that can affect the HARE-LWR's performance is the damping caused by the electrodes. It was reported that the electrode material can affect the insertion loss of conventional SAW filters [32]. One might question that using HAREs can increase the damping caused by the electrodes and thus decrease the quality factor of the HARE-LWR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, 5 nm thick titanium (Ti) and 50 nm thick aluminium (Al) were deposited by electron beam evaporation. The Ti layer improves the adhesion and temperature stability of the Al metallisation [11]. The bond pad and bus bars were formed by another lift-off step using image reversal resist (Clariant AZ5214E) and evaporating 50 nm thick Ti and 700 nm thick Al.…”
Section: Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System filtering requirements included a 3 dB bandwith of 5 MHz, passband ripple of less than . 3 dB, rejection at the image frequency (289. 3 MHz) in excess of 80 dBc, and rejection elsewhere of greater than 50 dBc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 dB, rejection at the image frequency (289. 3 MHz) in excess of 80 dBc, and rejection elsewhere of greater than 50 dBc. Additional requirements included a gain of 16 dB, a noise figure of less than 4 dB and a third order intercept of greater than 0 dBm refered to the input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%