2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved SDOF and numerical approach to study the dynamic response of reinforced concrete columns subjected to close-in blast loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all three cases, bending deformation occurs at the column, but the position of the crack formation differs. Liu et al [68] performed a parametric analysis in LS-Dyna to determine the influence of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement ratios, longitudinal force, and boundary conditions. They concluded that at smaller-scaled distances, the increase in transverse and longitudinal reinforcement reduces the displacement in the middle of the column.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all three cases, bending deformation occurs at the column, but the position of the crack formation differs. Liu et al [68] performed a parametric analysis in LS-Dyna to determine the influence of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement ratios, longitudinal force, and boundary conditions. They concluded that at smaller-scaled distances, the increase in transverse and longitudinal reinforcement reduces the displacement in the middle of the column.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results clearly indicate that the assumption of neglecting axial load would lead to conservative predictions of column responses to blast load is not necessarily correct. It should be noted that although the aforementioned studies (Chen et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2019) did take into account axial load effects, the investigations focused on RC columns in building structures rather than RC bridge columns, the ALR were 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0 in Chen et al (2019) and 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 in Liu et al (2019). However, unlike columns in buildings which typically experience service loads above their balance point, RC bridge columns typically sustain in-service axial loads that are below their balance point on an interaction diagram of axial force and bending moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the scaled distance of 0.4 m/kg 1/3 , there exists an ALR limit of 0.4, above which the failure of column suffers from the compression-shear failure. Liu et al (2019) investigated the blast performance of RC columns under the combined action of axial load and close-in explosion experimentally, the results showed that when the scaled distance was relatively large, the columns with higher axial loads suffered less damage than columns with smaller axial loads under the same loading scenario. With the decrease of the scaled distances, the axial load increased the level of damage to RC columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang [10] simulated the change of blasting dynamic load by changing the stress-strain relationship. Liu and Wang proposed e ective models for calculation of the equivalent uniform blast load for non-uniform blast load using the equivalent singledegree-of-freedom (SDOF) approach [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%