2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement in flux and antifouling properties of PVC ultrafiltration membranes by incorporation of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the contact angles for these membranes reduced as the concentration of ZnO nanoparticles increased from 2% (M‐2 and M‐6) to 5% (M‐5 and M‐9). Our results came in agreement with a previous study done by Rabiee et al in which it was seen that incorporating of ZnO nanoparticles in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane caused a reduction in the contact angle for the PVC‐ZnO ultrafiltration membranes in comparison with pure PVC …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In fact, the contact angles for these membranes reduced as the concentration of ZnO nanoparticles increased from 2% (M‐2 and M‐6) to 5% (M‐5 and M‐9). Our results came in agreement with a previous study done by Rabiee et al in which it was seen that incorporating of ZnO nanoparticles in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane caused a reduction in the contact angle for the PVC‐ZnO ultrafiltration membranes in comparison with pure PVC …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Due to variable conditions such as fouling, chemical exposure, disintegration, cleaning etc. membrane performance decrease with the passage of time so characterization in this case using specific techniques gives valuable information about membrane structure and its topography in order to get insight about performance loss or affected membrane structure [206][207][208][209][210][211]. Similarly, modified membranes (modification with nano-materials) are also characterized in order to get information about modified surface layer for membrane performance.…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity (ɛ) of the membranes was measured using following eq. normalPnormalonormalrnormalonormalsnormalinormaltnormaly true(%true)=Ww Wdd × A × δ where W w and W d are defined as membrane wet and dry weight, respectively; d is the membrane thickness (m), A is the membrane effective area (m 2 ), and δ is the water density (1 g/cm³).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Guerout–Elford–Ferry equation was used to measure mean pore radius ( r m ) of the membranes [eq. ] rm=2.9 1.75ɛ × 8ηδQɛ × A × ΔP where Q is pure water flux (PWF) (m 3 /s), η is water viscosity (8.9 × 10 −4 Pa s), and Δ P is the filtration pressure (0.3 MPa).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%