2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0578563416400118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Tsunami Countermeasures Based on Lessons from The 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami — Situation After Five Years

Abstract: The 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami exposed many hidden weaknesses in Japan's tsunami countermeasures. Since then, many improvements have been made in both structural measures (numerical simulations, coastal defense structures, building damage assessment and control forests) and nonstructural measures (warning/observation and evacuation). This review summarizes the lessons and improvements in the five-year time period after the 2011 event. After five years, most of the lessons from the 2011 tsunami have been app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors show that awareness of tsunamis on the Sanriku coast was higher because it had been impacted by recent tsunami (in 1896 and 1933) whereas the Sendai coast had not, and infer that this elevated awareness led in most places to more effective evacuation behaviors. A similar conclusion was reached in earlier investigations within the Sanriku region by Ando et al (2013) [8], and in the analysis by Day and Fearnley (2015) [9], who emphasized that prior learning about hazards and evacuation behaviors is essential for effective human evacuation behavior in response to warnings from even the most advanced alarm and defense systems.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These authors show that awareness of tsunamis on the Sanriku coast was higher because it had been impacted by recent tsunami (in 1896 and 1933) whereas the Sendai coast had not, and infer that this elevated awareness led in most places to more effective evacuation behaviors. A similar conclusion was reached in earlier investigations within the Sanriku region by Ando et al (2013) [8], and in the analysis by Day and Fearnley (2015) [9], who emphasized that prior learning about hazards and evacuation behaviors is essential for effective human evacuation behavior in response to warnings from even the most advanced alarm and defense systems.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Suppasri et al, 2016). Therefore, we simulated a scenario in which the first and second dikes did not break.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Sedimentary Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsunami predictions in urban area have been conducted by using several kinds of models [4]. For example, Arikawa and Tomita [5,6] coupled a Storm surge and Tsunami simulator in Oceans and Coastal areas (STOC) [7] and a Super Roller Flume for Computer Aided Design of Maritime Structure in 3D (CADMAS-SURF/3D) [8] using a volume of fluid (VOF) method to efficiently simulate tsunamis from the source to run-up in both directions, and Suwa et al [9] also developed a model integrating a Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic (SPH) method and a two-dimensional nonlinear shallow water wave (NSWW) model (TUNAMI-N2 [10,11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%