Improving access to health technologies by the poor: the social context in Tanzanian bed net production and delivery

Abstract

This article considers the factors that determine the ability to innovate health technologies in order to make them available to those who need them most in developing countries and rid populations of disease. It uses the case of Tanzanian bed/mosquito nets particularly those treated with insecticide which are promoted as a key prevention mechanism in the fight against malaria. Reviewing the success story of Tanzania in the production, distribution and use of bed nets, the article asks questions regarding the future ability to sustain progress. Using the concept of social technologies, the article highlights the importance of understanding the social context of the bed net innovation process. It therefore highlights the need to consider the bed net story as one not merely of effective distribution but, more significantly, of the whole innovation value chain from inputs to the textile factories making the nets to consumer needs and demands. It enriches our understanding of the complex nature in which the physical technologies (bed nets) are accessed by the poor and how this relates to the overall health system.

Biotechnologies for inclusive development: scaling up, knowledge intensity and empowerment (the case of the probiotic yoghurt ‘Yogurito’ in Argentina)

“…With a business-oriented management perspective, it considers low-income population as a potential market and frames their needs as unsatisfied consumer demand. Secondly, those who advocacy for 'below the radar' innovation, also look for the role of the private sector on inclusive innovation, but in this case returning to innovation systems analysis to explore strategies to strengthen productive chains by small and medium local producers and favour technology adoption (Hanlin and Muraguri 2009;Foster and Heeks 2013;Chataway, Hanlin, and Kaplinsky 2014).…”

Comparing frugality and inclusion in innovation for development: logic, process and outcome

“…In the case of M-Pesa, inclusivity is evident in Vodafone's involvement of multiple actors and learning processes are occurring through these interactions Foster and Heeks, 2013b;Hanlin and Muraguri, 2009;Joseph, 2014;Swaans et al, 2014). In view of this, inclusive innovation scholars aim at taking 'a more holistic conception of the innovation cycle' (Chataway et al, 2014, p. 33) on one hand, and considering the inclusiveness of the underlying innovation system (Joseph, 2014).…”

Inclusive Innovation and Rapid Sociotechnical Transitions: The Case of Mobile Money in Kenya

“…Each level represents a gradual deepening and broadening of the extent of inclusion achieved through innovation processes. (Seyfang & Smith, 2007)  Associated with environmental sustainability (Seyfang & Smith, 2007), 'ecological ethics' (Gupta et al, 2003 (Fressoli, Smith, & Thomas, 2011;Hanlin & Muraguri, 2009); Social entrepreneurship, social ventures  Innovation geared towards problem-solving and sustainable business models rather than profitability  'social' used as the opposite to 'economic' (Cozzens & Sutz, 2014) (Kaplinsky, 2011b); Bottom of the pyramid, BRI (Cozzens & Sutz, 2014) Refer to innovations for and by the poor in general. There is no clarity in the literature about how this term is used.…”