2013
DOI: 10.1118/1.4789486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving best‐phase image quality in cardiac CT by motion correction with MAM optimization

Abstract: The proposed method allows a software-based best-phase image quality improvement in coronary CT angiography. A short scan data interval at the target heart phase is sufficient, no additional scan data in other cardiac phases are required. The algorithm is therefore directly applicable to any standard cardiac CT acquisition protocol.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, despite the novel scanner hardware development, cardiac coronary artery imaging still poses significant challenges to CT due to the presence of irregular and rapid vessel motion. Motion-induced artifacts even appear in patients with low heart-rates, resulting from the relatively high velocities of some of the coronary arteries [83]. Recent development of an advanced algorithm seems to offer good solutions to address this issue [84 •• ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, despite the novel scanner hardware development, cardiac coronary artery imaging still poses significant challenges to CT due to the presence of irregular and rapid vessel motion. Motion-induced artifacts even appear in patients with low heart-rates, resulting from the relatively high velocities of some of the coronary arteries [83]. Recent development of an advanced algorithm seems to offer good solutions to address this issue [84 •• ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, estimating only one parameter may be sufficient to obtain a reasonable image quality. A straightforward estimation method is to create reconstructions for various u -direction offsets and either manually select the visually most accurate reconstruction or automatically select the best reconstruction based on image quality measures such as Entropy or Positivity (Rohkohl et al; 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only little work has been done on purely image-based motion estimation. Some methods impose assumptions on the imaged object and optimize entropy or positivity measures for the 3-D reconstruction (Rohkohl et al; 2013; Ens et al; 2010). Others use mathematically formulated data consistency conditions (CC) that describe redundancies in projection or sinogram domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Furthermore, algorithms that correct for motion during reconstruction are becoming clinically available. 14,15 Even when using these techniques, it is still prudent to avoid as much motion during acquisition as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%