Improving Creative Thinking Through Creative Responsibility Based Learning (CRBL) Model

Abstract

The use of various models and approaches still shows that students have difficulties understanding science content. This obstacle causes psychological barriers for students, so creative thinking skills are needed. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in creative thinking skills between students who follow the Creative Responsibility Based Learning (CRBL) learning model and students who follow the conventional learning model in terms of students' self-efficacy in learning science. This type of research is an experimental study with a Non-Randomized Post-test Only Control Group Design. In this design, the subject is not taken randomly. The number of population members is 184 students. The techniques used to analyze the data are qualitative descriptive analysis, quantitative, and inferential statistics. The result of the research is that the science learning outcomes of students who follow the CRBL learning model are higher than students who follow the conventional learning model with a significance value of 0.044 < 0.005. There is a difference in creative thinking ability between fourth grade elementary school students who have high self-efficacy and low self-efficacy in science learning with a significance value of 0.00 <0.05). There is a significant interaction effect between the learning model and self-efficacy on students' creative thinking skills with a significance value of 0.00 < 0.05). It can be concluded that this learning model provides direct learning experiences to students in building self-efficacy and creative thinking skills in learning basic science concepts so that teachers can apply them.

Changes in Students' Cognitive Structure on the Concept of Diffraction and Light Interference Using PhET Virtual Simulation

“…The test used to determine student learning outcomes uses description questions (Wang et al, 2021). In addition to providing a concept map test, the data collection is also supported by a test in the form of an essay test (Pratama et al, 2020). Although these two types of tests have their characteristics, they both have the same variance so both can be used as learning evaluation tools.…”

Pendidikan Keaksaraan Dasar Literasi Mitigasi Bencana

“…Dalam hal ini terdapat perbedaan pemahaman dan ketahanmalangan siswa pada mata pelajaran IPA antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran mitigasi bencana dan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran konvensional. Model pembelajaran mitigasi bencana menghasilkan pemahaman dan ketahanmalangan pada mata pelajaran IPA yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran konvensional (Agustiana, Wibawa, dan Tika, 2013). Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pendidikan keaksaraan dasar literasi mitigasi bencana efektif.…”

English E-module Based on Mind Mapping to Enhance Student Achievement: A Study on Seventh Grade

“…Mind mapping was chosen because it can make students easier to understand the learning material without having to read a long and complicated explanations on textbook (Astuti et al, 2013;Ulya et al, 2019). In mind mapping, the material will be presented more attractive and simpler (Pratama et al, 2020;Zahro et al, 2018b). Also, students do not need to find the meaning of every word in dictionary due to the material explanation display through pictures and color variations so it can attract students' attention to learn English.…”