2021
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.210043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Filtration Efficacy of Medical Face Masks

Abstract: A simple unipolar positive corona charger was constructed and tested with five different medical face mask materials. Charging of particles significantly increased the filtration efficiency of each of the tested face mask against submicron particles. On the average, the increase in the efficiency was from 58 % to 93 % for 0.3 µm size particles. This improvement was achieved with practically insignificant increase in the pressure drop showing that there are possibilities to fully exploit the potential of electr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 a demonstrates the SEM images of spunbond-meltblown-spunbond (SMS) of a surgical face mask, while the sizes of common airborne contaminants and pathogens are shown in Figure 4 b. In a mask, non-woven SMS fabrics are typically used, which are spun-bond PP fabric (absorbent), melt-blown PP interlayer (electrically charged small fibrous material with random orientation), and spun-bond PP (blue color and hydrophobic) fabric on the outside [ 67 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. Spunbond–meltblown–meltblown–spunbond (SMMS), spunbond–meltblown (SM), spunbond–spunbond (SS), spunbond–spunbond–spunbond (SSS), and spunbond–spunbond–meltblown–meltblown–spunbond (SSMMS) are the other most prevalent combinations of structures in various weight ranges [ 72 ].…”
Section: Materials and Methods Used In Manufacturing Face Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 4 a demonstrates the SEM images of spunbond-meltblown-spunbond (SMS) of a surgical face mask, while the sizes of common airborne contaminants and pathogens are shown in Figure 4 b. In a mask, non-woven SMS fabrics are typically used, which are spun-bond PP fabric (absorbent), melt-blown PP interlayer (electrically charged small fibrous material with random orientation), and spun-bond PP (blue color and hydrophobic) fabric on the outside [ 67 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. Spunbond–meltblown–meltblown–spunbond (SMMS), spunbond–meltblown (SM), spunbond–spunbond (SS), spunbond–spunbond–spunbond (SSS), and spunbond–spunbond–meltblown–meltblown–spunbond (SSMMS) are the other most prevalent combinations of structures in various weight ranges [ 72 ].…”
Section: Materials and Methods Used In Manufacturing Face Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three classes of FFP, with respective efficiencies of 80%, 94%, and 99%. It has the maximum filtration efficiency and meets N95 standards [ 69 , 100 , 101 ].…”
Section: Efficacy Of Currently Available Face Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, these masks are not designed to protect against airborne particles (Oberg and Brosseau, 2008). Although the filter media of surgical masks, to some extent, enables to collect airborne particles (filtration efficiency for 0.3 µm particles at an airflow of 95 L/min: 28.4 -85.5%) (Kulmala et al, 2021), such particles tend to slip through or escape from gaps between the mask and the facial contours instead of being filtered through the mask itself (Chen and Willeke, 1992;Cappa et al, 2021;Su et al, 2022). Therefore, the effectiveness of these masks in reducing airborne particle exposure is limited and varies between individuals, mainly depending on how well the fit of the "loose-fitting" surgical mask is.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%