Improving Fluid Intelligence With Training on Working Memory: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Working memory (WM), the ability to store and manipulate information for short periods of time, is an important predictor of scholastic aptitude and a critical bottleneck underlying higher-order cognitive processes, including controlled attention and reasoning. Recent interventions targeting WM have suggested plasticity of the WM system by demonstrating improvements in both trained and untrained WM tasks. However, evidence on transfer of improved WM into more general cognitive domains such as fluid intelligence (Gf) has been more equivocal. Therefore, we conducted a metaanalysis focusing on one specific training program, n-back. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for all n-back training studies with Gf outcome measures, a control group, and healthy participants between 18 and 50 years of age. In total, we included 20 studies in our analyses that met our criteria and found a small but significant positive effect of nback training on improving Gf. Several factors that moderate this transfer are identified and discussed. We conclude that short-term cognitive training on the order of weeks can result in beneficial effects in important cognitive functions as measured by laboratory tests.

Cognitive control interventions for depression: A systematic review of findings from training studies

“…Furthermore, other studies using a broad battery of tasks targeting working memory capacity and executive functions (e.g., multiple adaptive single-and complex working memory span tasks) failed to observe transfer to fluid intelligence after demonstrating near transfer (e.g., Harrison et al, 2013). However, recent meta-analytical findings confirm that dual n-back training can improve fluid intelligence (Au et al, 2015). These mixed findings indicate the need for multiple measures of both near and far transfer (for reviews see Klingberg, 2010;Shipstead et al, 2012;Simons et al, 2016).…”

“…Despite ongoing controversy over the effectiveness of cognitive control or working memory training transfer effects to cognitive performance (for critical reviews see Shipstead et al, 2012;Simons et al, 2016), there is extensive research indicating that sustained practice of specific cognitive operations can have reliable effects on cognitive performance on related tasks (near transfer) at behavioural and neural levels (Au et al, 2015;Klingberg, 2010).…”

Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases the Benefit of At-Home Cognitive Training in Multiple Sclerosis

“…The training consisted of five traditional tasks that have been demonstrated to lead to benefit, both with and without adjunctive tDCS (n-back, auditory and visual span, simple arithmetic, and match-to-sample (15,18,20,22,29,(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)). Based on our experience, we have found these training tasks to be the best-designed with the highest compliance rates (e.g., reaching 80% or more of target playing time in a sample of ten pilot participants (52)).…”

Can training change attentional breadth? Failure to find transfer effects

“…Nevertheless, recent meta-analytical findings regarding cognitive training effects in the field of working memory training suggest that such training effects can be obtained regardless of whether training is administered in the lab or at home (Au,Sheehan,28 CAN TRAINING CHANGE ATTENTIONAL BREADTH Tsai, Duncan, Buschkuehl, & Jaeggi, 2014). Third, although we instructed participants to always focus on the central fixation point, it is possible that they may have directed attention to other regions.…”