2021
DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2021.1971114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving meta-analyses on hypothetical bias by using separate models for private and public goods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of these mitigation methods, Atozou et al. (2021, 2020) and Penn and Hu (2018) find that choice experiment, cheap talk, consequentiality, and certainty significantly contribute to explaining and reducing the magnitude of HB. Second, there are many situations, as in the present study, where it is difficult to infer preferences from revealed data, such as data that may not actually exist.…”
Section: Preference Elicitation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of these mitigation methods, Atozou et al. (2021, 2020) and Penn and Hu (2018) find that choice experiment, cheap talk, consequentiality, and certainty significantly contribute to explaining and reducing the magnitude of HB. Second, there are many situations, as in the present study, where it is difficult to infer preferences from revealed data, such as data that may not actually exist.…”
Section: Preference Elicitation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the inherent HB of using the SP method can be eliminated or mitigated through several methods (auction, referendum vote, choice experiment, cheap talk, consequentiality, and certainty) suggested in the literature. Out of these mitigation methods, Atozou et al (2021Atozou et al ( , 2020 and Penn and Hu (2018) find that choice experiment, cheap talk, consequentiality, and certainty significantly contribute to explaining and reducing the magnitude of HB. Second, there are many situations, as in the present study, where it is difficult 8 to infer preferences from revealed data, such as data that may not actually exist.…”
Section: Double-bounded Stated-preference Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%