2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2019.106678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving solar development policy and planning through stakeholder engagement: The Long Island Solar Roadmap Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey described here was developed as one part of a larger project examining the technical, economic, spatial, and social factors influencing mid-to large-scale solar development on Long Island with the purpose of providing information to promote development while reducing siting conflicts [7]. This project involved stakeholder-driven processes and initial interviews and discussions with a diverse set of actors involved in solar energy development on Long Island.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The survey described here was developed as one part of a larger project examining the technical, economic, spatial, and social factors influencing mid-to large-scale solar development on Long Island with the purpose of providing information to promote development while reducing siting conflicts [7]. This project involved stakeholder-driven processes and initial interviews and discussions with a diverse set of actors involved in solar energy development on Long Island.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey was administered online by the local electric utility, one of the stakeholders that participated in this project, and sent to 50,000 randomly selected customer email addresses representing a utility service territory of approximately 1 million customers in Suffolk and Nassau Counties, New York (see Figure 1). The survey was developed to be easily accessible on mobile devices and, at the request of the project team [7], was developed with an English or Spanish language option, which respondents could select once entering the survey. The survey resulted in a total of 405 responses, six of which were responses to the Spanish language version of the survey, a total response rate of less than 1%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techno-economic feasibility of 100% or nearly 100% RE transition in the United States have been studied by various researchers [16][17][18]. Previous studies have captured public and stakeholder perceptions on solar projects [9,19], while other studies have shown the engagement of individuals on various wind projects [20]. One of the explanations for the dearth in this research area is the relatively new concept of 100% RE in the United States and the very few empirical case studies in this context.…”
Section: Public Perception Of 100% Renewable Electricity In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these in mind, it is important to investigate whether WUP residents would show buy-in for such a transition that has potential energy cost savings and their willingness to support a municipality-led initiative that will reduce their energy consumption. In research done in other contexts, supportive public attitudes have been due to positive economic benefits in Southern California [8], while locally funded projects by private entities have received the most support in the case of Long Island [9]. As these factors cannot be generalized for all places in the United States due to the uniqueness of every city and state, it is important to understand whether these factors can spur support or opposition in other places.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision factor has nothing to do with the environment, economics, or solar itself, but indicates the unexplored role perceptions of trust play in motivating renewable energy technology adoption. Other recent research also indicates that concerns regarding trust are important in shaping perceptions of solar technology development [26]; a recent study on Long Island found that concern that the economic benefits of solar are not equitably distributed, a concern anchored in lack of trust regarding a fair distribution of benefits associated with solar, was the most highly ranked concern about solar development [27]. Previous research suggests that peer effects influence adoption [28], while the current study suggests perceived reputation of installers is more influential.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%