2019
DOI: 10.1109/te.2019.2918097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Student Engagement in Teaching Electric Machines Through Blended Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has found blended learning in undergraduate engineering courses led to improved student satisfaction and resulted in greater student engagement and class attendance, among other non-tangible benefits (Clark et al, 2016;Harris & Park, 2016;Jamieson & Shaw, 2016;Rahman, 2017;Ravishankar & Jones, 2017;Shanmuganathan, 2018). Results also indicate that engineering students perform better (improved final exam marks) in a blended learning environment, as compared to a traditional lecture format (Clark et al, 2016;Karabulut-Ilgu et al, 2018;Rahman, 2017;Shannon et al, 2013;Singh et al, 2019). However, a number of questions remain regarding the purpose, timing, and appropriateness of using blended learning techniques in upper year engineering courses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research has found blended learning in undergraduate engineering courses led to improved student satisfaction and resulted in greater student engagement and class attendance, among other non-tangible benefits (Clark et al, 2016;Harris & Park, 2016;Jamieson & Shaw, 2016;Rahman, 2017;Ravishankar & Jones, 2017;Shanmuganathan, 2018). Results also indicate that engineering students perform better (improved final exam marks) in a blended learning environment, as compared to a traditional lecture format (Clark et al, 2016;Karabulut-Ilgu et al, 2018;Rahman, 2017;Shannon et al, 2013;Singh et al, 2019). However, a number of questions remain regarding the purpose, timing, and appropriateness of using blended learning techniques in upper year engineering courses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research in the field of educational methodologies and their applications suggest that predefined laboratory practices are not as much a significant contributor towards student performance as lecturers can at first imagine [1]- [5]. Actually, it is an open research field to understand both, the components and constructs that enable significant student engagement in order to achieve high quality education [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several decades, the process of collaborative learning has been studied as a matter of great interest [15], [16]. Even more, considerable effort has been put into correlating the level and quality of student engagement and personal development with the academic program and activities carried out during lectures throughout the semester [1], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, most courses with a virtual laboratory are too dependent on the online section. Therefore, the main contribution of this study lies in two aspects: using the new technologies to design and implement a virtual laboratory and adopting a blended learning scheme to balance the online and offline sections in light of the investigations on blended learning approaches [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%