2014 World Automation Congress (WAC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/wac.2014.6935730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the accuracy of the method for removing motion artifacts from fNIRS data using ICA and an accelerometer

Abstract: Independent component analysis (ICA) is one of the most preferred methods for removing motion artifacts from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data. In this method, the fNIRS signal is separated into components by ICA and the component that shows high correlation between the fNIRS signal and motion artifact is determined. This component is removed, and the fNIRS signal without motion artifacts is derived. However, fNIRS data are often delayed temporally compared with accelerometer data because the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is challenging to identify the fECG component for further processing [ 11 ]. Therefore, the BSS methods usually require the determination of other parameters (e.g., t -test, correlation coefficient, heart rate) to automatically identify the extracted components [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Template subtraction (TS) is another widely used approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is challenging to identify the fECG component for further processing [ 11 ]. Therefore, the BSS methods usually require the determination of other parameters (e.g., t -test, correlation coefficient, heart rate) to automatically identify the extracted components [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Template subtraction (TS) is another widely used approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the BSS methods usually require the determination of other parameters ( e . g ., t-test, correlation coefficient, heart rate) to automatically identify the extracted components [12-14]. Template subtraction (TS) is another widely used approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, after extraction, the order of the separated independent component could not be determined, thus it is challenging to identify the fECG component for further processing [11]. Therefore, the BSS methods usually require the determination of other parameters (e.g., ttest, correlation coefficient, heart rate) to automatically identify the extracted components [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it shows promising performance in fECG extraction, the order of the separated independent component could not be determined, thus it is challenging to identify the fECG component for further process [18]. A number of parameters (e.g., t-test, correlation coefficient, heart rate) has been used for the automatic identification of the extracted component [19][20][21]. Template subtraction (TS) is another widely used approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%