2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.733772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-depth analysis of optical crosstalk in single-photon avalanche diode arrays

Abstract: One of the main drawbacks of Single Photon Avalanche Diode arrays is the optical crosstalk between adjacent detectors. This phenomenon represents a fundamental limit to the density of arrays, since the crosstalk increases with reducing the distance between adjacent devices. In the past, crosstalk was mainly ascribed to the light propagating from one detector to another through a direct optical path. Accordingly, deep trenches coated with metal were introduced as optical isolation barriers between pixels. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that the diffusion time of minority carries in the deep N-well due to electrical crosstalk contributes to the further widening of the distribution. On the other hand, the crosstalk-probability reduction from D1 to D2 is greater than the theoretically expected rate of direct optical attenuation (1/r 2 )e -αr , where r is the distance from the emitter, and α is the absorption coefficient of silicon [9,15]. This also suggests the presence of electrical crosstalk, which is attenuated with a higher rate proportional to e -r2 [11].…”
Section: Noise-based Crosstalk Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results suggest that the diffusion time of minority carries in the deep N-well due to electrical crosstalk contributes to the further widening of the distribution. On the other hand, the crosstalk-probability reduction from D1 to D2 is greater than the theoretically expected rate of direct optical attenuation (1/r 2 )e -αr , where r is the distance from the emitter, and α is the absorption coefficient of silicon [9,15]. This also suggests the presence of electrical crosstalk, which is attenuated with a higher rate proportional to e -r2 [11].…”
Section: Noise-based Crosstalk Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements performed for the crosstalk assessment were "coincidence" measurements, in which detector SPADs are monitored after a breakdown in the emitter and the time differences of their breakdowns with respect to that of the emitter are recorded. In coincidence measurements, the temporal correlation of crosstalk events and the crosstalk probability can be evaluated directly, in contrast to "pseudo-crosstalk" measurements, in which the emitter is continuously reverse-biased above breakdown with a constant current for a specific integration time and the count rate of the detector is evaluated during this time [13][14][15]. "Pseudo-crosstalk" measurements have significantly shorter acquisition times; however, owing to their indirect nature, only a value proportional to the crosstalk probability is acquired, with no data on the timing relevance of crosstalk breakdown events.…”
Section: Noise-based Crosstalk Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ideally the counting rates of two different detectors in the array should be totally uncorrelated. Unfortunately optical coupling between nearby devices causes some sort of correlation; at the device level this is due to the avalanches that are triggered in one detector as a result of the optical emission of another SPAD that is subject to current flow 13 . Measures show that the crosstalk varies from 8.1 × 10 −4 to 1.7 × 10 −3 , depending on the distance between the considered detectors.…”
Section: Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 99%