2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Plane Shear Strength Improvement of Hollow Concrete Masonry Panels Using a Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Basalt fibres may be used separately as microfibers, successfully fulfilling the function of a reinforcing agent in composite materials based on inorganic matrices [4,5,6,7], or as a reinforcement element in the form of a surface fabric, the use of which appears to be very effective [1,8]. In addition, basalt fibres arranged in the form of a surface fabric have been successfully used in the past, for example in reinforcing concrete beams [9], historical pillars [10] or surface panels [1,11,12]. In all of the mentioned cases, basalt fibres, whether as single fibres, fibre bundles or fibre lattices, function as a reinforcement element in a matrix made of concrete, mortar or other material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basalt fibres may be used separately as microfibers, successfully fulfilling the function of a reinforcing agent in composite materials based on inorganic matrices [4,5,6,7], or as a reinforcement element in the form of a surface fabric, the use of which appears to be very effective [1,8]. In addition, basalt fibres arranged in the form of a surface fabric have been successfully used in the past, for example in reinforcing concrete beams [9], historical pillars [10] or surface panels [1,11,12]. In all of the mentioned cases, basalt fibres, whether as single fibres, fibre bundles or fibre lattices, function as a reinforcement element in a matrix made of concrete, mortar or other material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the FRCM in strengthening URM structures, such as FRCM-confined masonry columns (Cascardi et al, 2018;Fossetti and Minafo`, 2017;Krevaikas, 2019;Mezrea et al, 2017), FRCM-strengthened URM walls under in-plane and out-of-plane actions (Augenti et al, 2011;Babaeidarabad et al, 2015;Ismail et al, 2018;Marcari et al, 2017;Papanicolaou et al, 2008;Parisi et al, 2013;Prota et al, 2006;Sagar et al, 2017), and FRCM-strengthened arches and vaults (Carozzi et al, 2018;Garmendia et al, 2015;Giamundo et al, 2015;Ramaglia et al, 2016). These investigations indicated that the carrying and deformation capacities of URM structures or members are effectively improved after FRCM strengthening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Finally, some other authors such as Ismail, et al [13], Kariou, et al [14] and Shabdin, et al [8] carried out flexural strength tests to characterize the effect of the TRM technique in the improvement of the infill panels OOP capacity. This manuscript aims presenting a experimental study to assess the efficiency of using TRMbased strengthening solutions to prevent the out-of-plane collapse of masonry infills in RC buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%