2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-process Tool Wear Prediction System Based on Machine Learning Techniques and Force Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As was stated in Section 1, the most adequate method is using analysis of the forces. In the literature, one can find multiple examples which present the correlation between the tool wear and the cutting forces [32][33][34][35][36]. For that reason, the load distribution for a spherical bowl punch was analyzed and the obtained model is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of the Geometrical Features Of The Punch And Die Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was stated in Section 1, the most adequate method is using analysis of the forces. In the literature, one can find multiple examples which present the correlation between the tool wear and the cutting forces [32][33][34][35][36]. For that reason, the load distribution for a spherical bowl punch was analyzed and the obtained model is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of the Geometrical Features Of The Punch And Die Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described before, the first one reads sequences of triplets, which are passed on to the Classifier module. Subsequences of these, i.e., arrays of consecutive triplets, are randomly sampled without repetition and passed, in turns, to the GASF component [39], which is in charge of producing polar coordinate images that feed into the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Model component implemented in Tensorflow. Then, the CNN Model analyses these images in order to report a class that reflects the current stage of the tool wear.…”
Section: Computing Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for the Break-in class, it is required to sample from only one layer, whereas for the Failure class, it is required to sample from three different layers. Thus, after systematically sampling arrays of triplets from the training set, these are used as input to the GASF component [39], which performs two main tasks. First, it generates an image of 256 × 256 pixels for each of the force components of the sequence; second, it compiles and creates a three-channel object with the created images.…”
Section: Model Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, machine learning techniques were also presented to determine the tool wear evolution. For example, training artificial neural networks and variants in order to determine the tool wear from tool micrography [16,17], or to predict the tool wear from condition monitoring variables such as cutting forces [18]. F. W. Taylor presented a relationship between the lifetime of a cutting tool (T) and the cutting speed (v c ) [19], which has been extensively discussed and used in numerous studies [6,7,11,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%