“…It has also been adopted as a standardized OECD test method for evaluating chemical toxicity (OECD 2013); however, the data derived from the zebrafish FET test alone cannot be used to satisfy the regulatory requirements of REACH and thus must be combined with other data in a weight-of-evidence approach . Further adoption and enhanced use of the FET test as a standard method for assessing toxicity has been limited due, in part, to two primary factors: (1) unlike other fish-based test types, the FET test lacks endpoints capable of estimating sublethal adverse effects , and (2) the FET test has been found to be less sensitive than other test types for some chemicals, particularly those classified as neurotoxicants. , The development of sublethal endpoints for the FET test has been proposed to overcome these limitations and to broaden its appeal. − A variety of potential sublethal endpoints have been proposed, including the expression of genes related to development, , embryonic behaviors, and the presence of developmental abnormalities. ,,,, Of these proposed sublethal endpoints, developmental abnormalities may offer the most promise for inclusion as standard FET test endpoints. In general, developmental abnormalities can be easily visualized during routine mortality assessments conducted as part of the FET test, making them feasible with regard to time, cost, and equipment required.…”