2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ observations of melt degassing and hydrogen removal enhanced by ultrasonics in underwater wet welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same factor was responsible for higher abrasive wear resistance of layers welded inthe air. The water, as a welding environment, increased the cooling rate, which generated brittle structures [27][28][29][30][31]35,38] with lower wear resistance.…”
Section: Hardness Hv10 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same factor was responsible for higher abrasive wear resistance of layers welded inthe air. The water, as a welding environment, increased the cooling rate, which generated brittle structures [27][28][29][30][31]35,38] with lower wear resistance.…”
Section: Hardness Hv10 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is carried out in direct contact with water and can be performedusing different methods, e.g., by the self-shielded flux-cored arc welding (FCAW-S) method [27][28][29]. The FCAW-S process does not require the use of shielding gas, and it is easy to automate and train welders [23,[27][28][29][30]. However, manual metal arc (MMA) welding is still the most commonly used as an underwater welding process [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [33] proved, that droplet has significant influence on the stability of underwater welding process. Chen et al [34] stated also that ultrasonic energy decreases the porosity and diffusible hydrogen content, which can improve the quality of underwater welded joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of Re was proportional to the values of L and v. The melt flow improved by ultrasonic vibration increased the weld width and melt flow velocity. In previous studies, the calculated value of Re increased from 5614 to 11389, with the ultrasonic power increased from 0 to 60% [33]. Ultrasonic vibration accelerated the melt flow, which broke the stable status of grain growth.…”
Section: Microstructures and Microhardnessmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The value of the v e could be calculated by dividing weld penetration depth (P) by solidification time (t) of the weld pool. In the ordinary welding without ultrasonic (P and t were 2.36 mm and 6.7 s, respectively), the minimal escaping diameter for the cavitation bubble was approximately 22 µm [33]. It meant that cavitation bubbles would be left in the weld pool and became pores in the case of that the cavitation bubble was smaller than the critical value of 22 µm.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%