2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57262-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ Rb-Sr dating of slickenfibres in deep crystalline basement faults

Abstract: Establishing temporal constraints of faulting is of importance for tectonic and seismicity reconstructions and predictions. Conventional fault dating techniques commonly use bulk samples of syn-kinematic illite and other K-bearing minerals in fault gouges, which results in mixed ages of repeatedly reactivated faults as well as grain-size dependent age variations. Here we present a new approach to resolve fault reactivation histories by applying high-spatial resolution Rb-Sr dating to finegrained mineral slicke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
49
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The events started with Paleoproterozoic mylonitization followed by Mesoproterozoic, Neoproterozoic, Silurian-Carboniferous, Permian, and Jurassic fracture reactivation, featuring successively lower formation temperatures of the fracture coating minerals [23,[34][35][36]39,57,58]. Fracture reactivation was related to far-field orogenic events [57,59], as confirmed by high spatial resolution Rb/Sr and/or U-Pb dating of both slickenfibre minerals [36], veins [34], and bulk sample 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating [39,60]. Bulk sample 87 Sr/ 86 Sr analysis has shown an overall evolution from low values of Proterozoic calcite veins (from~0.7070) to much higher ratios (up to~0.7175-0.7185) in coatings of calcite in currently open and water-conducting fractures [23,32,61].…”
Section: Forsmark and Laxemar-äspö-sites For Sampling Of Ancient Calcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The events started with Paleoproterozoic mylonitization followed by Mesoproterozoic, Neoproterozoic, Silurian-Carboniferous, Permian, and Jurassic fracture reactivation, featuring successively lower formation temperatures of the fracture coating minerals [23,[34][35][36]39,57,58]. Fracture reactivation was related to far-field orogenic events [57,59], as confirmed by high spatial resolution Rb/Sr and/or U-Pb dating of both slickenfibre minerals [36], veins [34], and bulk sample 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating [39,60]. Bulk sample 87 Sr/ 86 Sr analysis has shown an overall evolution from low values of Proterozoic calcite veins (from~0.7070) to much higher ratios (up to~0.7175-0.7185) in coatings of calcite in currently open and water-conducting fractures [23,32,61].…”
Section: Forsmark and Laxemar-äspö-sites For Sampling Of Ancient Calcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We connect the calcite Sr isotope compositions with those of modern groundwater to determine whether the youngest of these calcite growth zones could be precipitated from the present-day waters. We compare and link the distinguished generations with published geochronological constraints [34,[36][37][38][39] of the same fracture assemblage to assess the overall temporal span of the precipitation history in presently water-conducting fractures. We also investigate the 87 Sr/ 86 Sr variability of modern calcite precipitated from fracture water in a borehole at 415 m depth over the course of 17 years, and compare these 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values with the modern source water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the work of Zack and Hogmalm (2016) and Hogmalm et al (2017) for assessing the most suitable reaction cell gases, several publications have attempted to solve geological problems using the in situ Rb-Sr technique (Şengün et al, 2019;Tillberg et al, 2017;Tillberg et al, 2020). All these studies, except the one from Tillberg et al (2020), identified only a single age population within individual samples, which could have been resolved (at higher precision) with solution Rb-Sr or 40 Ar/ 39 Ar. Tillberg et al (2020) observed multiple age populations in their samples, but these were from mineral separates and the textural context was not preserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these studies, except the one from Tillberg et al (2020), identified only a single age population within individual samples, which could have been resolved (at higher precision) with solution Rb-Sr or 40 Ar/ 39 Ar. Tillberg et al (2020) observed multiple age populations in their samples, but these were from mineral separates and the textural context was not preserved. To date, no published study has taken full advantage of the spatial resolving power of the in situ Rb-Sr technique whilst retaining textural context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault histories are also important for building regional tectonic frameworks, understanding ore genesis, forming basin evolution models, and studying seismically active faults that pose geohazards and engineering challenges (e.g., Zwingmann et al, 2010). Fault timing is typi-cally constrained through cross-cutting relationships, but is more precisely achieved by direct dating of fault-generated materials such as fault gouge, slip-surface hematite, opal, pseudotachylyte, and slickenfibers (Nuriel et al, 2012(Nuriel et al, , 2019aTagami, 2012;Ault et al, 2015;Tillberg et al, 2020).…”
Section: Dating Brittle Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%