2020
DOI: 10.5194/gchron-2020-7
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving multiple geological events using in situ Rb-Sr geochronology: implications for metallogenesis at Tropicana, Western Australia

Abstract: Abstract. Dating multiple geological events in single samples using thermochronology and geochronology is relatively common but it is only with the recent advent of triple quadrupole LA-ICP-MS that in situ Rb-Sr dating has become a more commonly applied and powerful tool to date K- and Rb-bearing minerals. Here, we date, for the first time, two generations of mineral assemblages in individual thin sections using the in situ Rb-Sr method. Two distinct mineral assemblages, both probably associated with A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because titanite from one sample retains the protolith age (1959 ± 25 Ma, FMR101), we infer that this deformational event occurred at temperatures lower than that of average Pb closure in titanite (~600–700°C), and higher than the average Pb closure temperature of apatite (~450–550°C) (Chamberlain & Bowring, 2000; Cherniak, 2010; Oriolo et al, 2018; Schoene & Bowring, 2006). We infer that this deformational event occurred at temperatures of ~450–550°C, consistent with reset of the apatite U–Pb and white‐mica Rb–Sr systems (e.g., Eberlei et al, 2015; Jepson et al, 2021; Kirkland et al, 2017; Odlum & Stockli, 2020; Olierook et al, 2020; Ribeiro, Mulder, et al, 2020). The deformation temperature is qualitatively supported by the dominance of quartz SGR and GBM (Figure 3a–d), commonly developed at medium‐grade thermal conditions in strain rate regimes for natural faults (Faleiros et al, 2010; Stipp et al, 2002a, 2002b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because titanite from one sample retains the protolith age (1959 ± 25 Ma, FMR101), we infer that this deformational event occurred at temperatures lower than that of average Pb closure in titanite (~600–700°C), and higher than the average Pb closure temperature of apatite (~450–550°C) (Chamberlain & Bowring, 2000; Cherniak, 2010; Oriolo et al, 2018; Schoene & Bowring, 2006). We infer that this deformational event occurred at temperatures of ~450–550°C, consistent with reset of the apatite U–Pb and white‐mica Rb–Sr systems (e.g., Eberlei et al, 2015; Jepson et al, 2021; Kirkland et al, 2017; Odlum & Stockli, 2020; Olierook et al, 2020; Ribeiro, Mulder, et al, 2020). The deformation temperature is qualitatively supported by the dominance of quartz SGR and GBM (Figure 3a–d), commonly developed at medium‐grade thermal conditions in strain rate regimes for natural faults (Faleiros et al, 2010; Stipp et al, 2002a, 2002b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This interpretation is supported by low temperature microstructures including pervasive quartz BLG overprint and fractured feldspar (Figure 3d). Additionally, this suggests that the white‐mica Rb–Sr system can be affected by thermal events with temperature conditions below ~450°C (e.g., Olierook et al, 2020), pushing the lower limit of the closure temperature beyond what was previously suggested (<500°C; Eberlei et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Being cost and time efficient, it is possible to collect large 87 Rb/ 86 Sr and 87 Sr/ 86 Sr data sets from multiple grains and mineral species, which makes it an attractive new tool in geochronology (e.g., Gorojovsky and Alard 2020, Olierook et al . 2020, Redaa et al . 2021, Tillberg et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%