2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30098-2_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ Thermal Monitoring of Printed Components During Rapid Prototyping by Fused Deposition Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 shows that the emissivity coefficient of ABS is 0.91, which is close to the range reported in previous studies (Pooladvand et al , 2020; Morgan et al , 2017).…”
Section: Materials and Equipmentsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 9 shows that the emissivity coefficient of ABS is 0.91, which is close to the range reported in previous studies (Pooladvand et al , 2020; Morgan et al , 2017).…”
Section: Materials and Equipmentsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The corresponding experimental setup and results are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. Figure 9 shows that the emissivity coefficient of ABS is 0.91, which is close to the range reported in previous studies (Pooladvand et al, 2020;Morgan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Emissivity Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another source of uncertainty is the emissivity of the deposited material changing with temperature. A study on acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) found that this effect led to a misread of 36 • C at a 240 • C readout temperature [21]. However, this is above the melting temperature of ABS, and a finished layer of a print will have cooled down when being measured.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%