2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro activity of Bulgarian propolis against 94 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are presented as MIC values (Table 1), except for e. coli since no antibacterial activity could be detected and all MIC values were above 50 mg/ml. Nina et al (2015) described limited activity of propolis samples from Argentina against e. coli, while others (Boyanova et al 2006;Kosalec et al 2007) found no inhibitory activity of Bulgarian and Brazilian propolis, respectively, against e. coli. Kosalec et al (2007) found MIC values of below 10.4 mg/ml against e. coli while testing Croatian propolis samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are presented as MIC values (Table 1), except for e. coli since no antibacterial activity could be detected and all MIC values were above 50 mg/ml. Nina et al (2015) described limited activity of propolis samples from Argentina against e. coli, while others (Boyanova et al 2006;Kosalec et al 2007) found no inhibitory activity of Bulgarian and Brazilian propolis, respectively, against e. coli. Kosalec et al (2007) found MIC values of below 10.4 mg/ml against e. coli while testing Croatian propolis samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Kačániová et al (2012) reported that feeding of propolis to chickens increased enterococcus and lactobacillus in excreta, propolis residue seems to have the potency to increase the growth of some kinds of bacteria. Boyanova et al (2006) reported that Bulgarian propolis was highly active against the anaerobic bacteria including Prevotellaceae. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the antibacterial effect against the family Prevotellaceae was also found in the propolis residue collected from Iwate prefecture in Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dobrowolsky et al (1991) however, observed inhibition zones of 16.0 mm for both S. aureus and for Streptococcus pyogenes. Boyanova et al 2006 used the same methodology to evaluate antimicrobial activity of Bulgarian propolis against anaerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and recorded inhibition zones greater than or equal to 15 mm for the majority of Gram-positive bacteria, at concentrations of 30 µL of propolis per well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%