2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests on fullerene C60 nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this, we considered that our results, shown here using peripheral blood of mice, re‰ected genotoxicity of C60 on bone marrows. Our data are consistent with theˆnding that C 60 administered by gavage to ICR mice is negative in the in vivo bone marrow micronucleus test (4). These reports and our result suggest that intraperitoneal injection and gavage of C60 are negative for genotoxicity on bone marrow cells including erythroid precursors and HSCs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this, we considered that our results, shown here using peripheral blood of mice, re‰ected genotoxicity of C60 on bone marrows. Our data are consistent with theˆnding that C 60 administered by gavage to ICR mice is negative in the in vivo bone marrow micronucleus test (4). These reports and our result suggest that intraperitoneal injection and gavage of C60 are negative for genotoxicity on bone marrow cells including erythroid precursors and HSCs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It was reported that intratracheal instillation of C60 increased both mutation frequency detected by gpt-assay and DNA damage detected by comet assay in lung (3). Nevertheless another group showed that treatment with C60 by gavage has no genotoxical eŠect in ICR mice, using in vivo micronucleus test in bone marrow cells (4). These discrepancies could have been caused by diŠer-ences in administration route, test method, or target organ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also confirmed that 5,000 µg/plate of HPFs dissolved in squalane (200 mg/l C 60 ) and 1,000 µg/ plate of HPFs enwrapped in hydrogenated lecithin, glycine soja (soybean) sterols (6 mg/l C 60 ) were not mutagenic to test strains (Kato et al, 2009a(Kato et al, , 2009b. In addition, stable nano-sized C 60 suspensions in 0.1% CMC-Na aqueous solution did not induce significant positive mutagenic responses in any test strain in the bacterial reverse mutation test, when used at concentrations of up to 1,000 µg/plate (Shinohara et al, 2009). These results indicate that regardless of the solution or dispersion used, fullerenes are not mutagenic.…”
Section: Ames Testmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mori et al (2006) indicated that HPFs at dose of 5,000 µg/ml were considered not to have the ability in induce chromosomal aberration. In addition, Shinohara et al (2009) reported that stable nano-sized C 60 suspensions in 0.1% CMC-Na aqueous solutions (100 µg/ml and 200 µg/ml as the highest dose in the test without irradiation and with irradiation) were judged to be negative in the presence and absence of S9 mix with and without irradiation. These results suggest that regardless of the solution or dispersion used, fullerenes do not have the ability to induce chromosom- al aberration.…”
Section: Chromosomal Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation