2014
DOI: 10.2174/1386207317666140827123631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Selection of a Single-Stranded DNA Molecular Recognition Element for the Pesticide Malathion

Abstract: Many large-scale applications of the organophosphate pesticide malathion have led to widespread environmental contamination. Concentrations are found in the environment well above those which are harmful to humans and environmental organisms. No current method of detection for this pesticide is rapid, cost-effective, and specific for malathion. Therefore, we utilized a stringent Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX) process to identify a Molecular Recognition Element (MRE) for malat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The K d of R12.06 is comparable to other previously reported K d values of MREs targeting bacterial toxins [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. This further validates the SELEX variation previously developed by our laboratory [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The K d of R12.06 is comparable to other previously reported K d values of MREs targeting bacterial toxins [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. This further validates the SELEX variation previously developed by our laboratory [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Based upon these two observations, it is likely that the binding selectivity of the ssDNA library is enriched early on in the selection process and the target molecular weight and crystal structure may play a role in the selectivity of MREs. The overall low cross binding activities in all tested negative targets further validates the stringency of our selection process [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations