1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002709900232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Studies of Temporary Vena Cava Filters

Abstract: The vena cava flow model demonstrates significant differences in rates of clot capture (range 22%-98%) depending on cava diameter, thrombus size, and filter type.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14) Even small thrombi may cause symptoms and even death if they reach a previously compromised lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14) Even small thrombi may cause symptoms and even death if they reach a previously compromised lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been used to prevent recurrent PE in patients who are unresponsive to anticoagulation therapy or in who anticoagulation is contraindicated1. Although VCFs have been widely used in clinics, they still may endure major failures due to the buildup of thrombus in the filters themselves after deployment2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Effectiveness of permanent and retrievable filters in thrombus capture has been evaluated in experimental and clinical studies. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In one in vitro series, 16 retrievable filters were more effective in trapping thrombus compared to permanent devices, especially when small thrombi were considered. So far, no long-term studies of nonretrieved Gü nther Tulip filters have been published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%