Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, based on values of F and calcium release rate, one cannot differentiate between response of the pre-culture irradiated and non-irradiated calvaria. This agrees with conclusions from repeated in vivo synchrotron microCT of femora of rats Lane et al, 1998) and from dose measurements in a prototype in vivo laboratory microCT system (Kohlbrenner et al, 2001). The former studies concluded that the dose received during each examination was no higher than 90 rad and that bone response was not altered by up to five such exposures over 50 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Further, based on values of F and calcium release rate, one cannot differentiate between response of the pre-culture irradiated and non-irradiated calvaria. This agrees with conclusions from repeated in vivo synchrotron microCT of femora of rats Lane et al, 1998) and from dose measurements in a prototype in vivo laboratory microCT system (Kohlbrenner et al, 2001). The former studies concluded that the dose received during each examination was no higher than 90 rad and that bone response was not altered by up to five such exposures over 50 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The heart rate being of the order of 5 or more heart cycles per second would tend to blur out the cardiogenic distension of arteries and the cardiac ventricles to the longest duration phase of the cardiac cycle (i.e., diastole) (10,11).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They employed two-dimensional detectors consisting of phosphor screens which were optically coupled to cooled charge-coupled detector (CCD) arrays via an optical lens or a fiber-optic taper (e.g. [15,16]). Though being inefficient, the optical coupling via lenses offers the possibility of variable image magnification, whereas fiberoptic coupling is very efficient but uses fixed magnification [1].…”
Section: Detector Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%