2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-005-0152-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation and reactivation of horseradish peroxidase treated with supercritical carbon dioxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al (2002) observed a similar decrease of pH from 6.5 to 4.4 in juices after HPCD treatment. Gui, (2006a) also reported a pH reduction from 5.6 to 5.3 in horseradish peroxide solution. The decrease pH and increase in TA was due to CO 2 dissolution into juices or solutions, which further dissociated into bicarbonate, carbonate and hydrogen ions.…”
Section: Effect On Juice Tss Carotenoids Ph and Tamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Park et al (2002) observed a similar decrease of pH from 6.5 to 4.4 in juices after HPCD treatment. Gui, (2006a) also reported a pH reduction from 5.6 to 5.3 in horseradish peroxide solution. The decrease pH and increase in TA was due to CO 2 dissolution into juices or solutions, which further dissociated into bicarbonate, carbonate and hydrogen ions.…”
Section: Effect On Juice Tss Carotenoids Ph and Tamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Chen et al (1992) investigated changes in PPO activity associated with different high pressure CO 2 conditions and concluded that pressure-induced inactivation was caused by changes in enzyme secondary structure. The inactivation of horseradish peroxidase (Gui, Wang, et al, 2006), PME (Zhou, Wu, et al, 2009), and lipoxygenase ) by HPCD was related to the change of secondary and/or tertiary structure.…”
Section: Inactivation Of Hpcd and Mh On Ppo And Pme In Cloudy Apple Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same behavior was observed for the decimal reduction values, for which the time necessary to obtain a 90% reduction in the enzyme activity at 10 MPa was 38 h, while for samples under other conditions the decimal reduction time was approximately 20 hours. All regression coefficients (R²) were greater than 0.95, indicating a good linear fit [24].…”
Section: Data Onmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The experimental ݇ ௗ values were determined by the slope of the plot ofln(U/U 0 ) against the sample treatment time, wherein U is the enzyme activity at each experimental time and U 0 is the activity of the untreated enzyme, as described previously [22][23][24].…”
Section: Estimation Of Kinetic Data and Thermodynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%