2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inborn and experience-dependent models of categorical brain organization. A position paper

Abstract: The present review aims to summarize the debate in contemporary neuroscience between inborn and experience-dependent models of conceptual representations that goes back to the description of category-specific semantic disorders for biological and artifact categories. Experience-dependent models suggest that categorical disorders are the by-product of the differential weighting of different sources of knowledge in the representation of biological and artifact categories. These models maintain that semantic diso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
(309 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in this task participants first have to encode the stimuli and then deploy an attention-based selective mechanism that allows them to individuate the target elements. Once the relevant items are selected, they are retained in a vWM buffer, where they can ultimately be compared to a probe array 14 , 15 , 47 , 48 . In terms of EEG measurements, some event-related responses have been widely identified as markers of the cognitive mechanisms implicated in DMTS: (1) the N1, an early visual component of perceptual encoding 49 , 50 ; (2) the N2 posterior-contralateral (N2pc), an attention-related response of target individuation 51 53 ; (3) the contralateral delay activity (CDA), a late sustained component indexing active item maintenance in the vWM buffer 39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in this task participants first have to encode the stimuli and then deploy an attention-based selective mechanism that allows them to individuate the target elements. Once the relevant items are selected, they are retained in a vWM buffer, where they can ultimately be compared to a probe array 14 , 15 , 47 , 48 . In terms of EEG measurements, some event-related responses have been widely identified as markers of the cognitive mechanisms implicated in DMTS: (1) the N1, an early visual component of perceptual encoding 49 , 50 ; (2) the N2 posterior-contralateral (N2pc), an attention-related response of target individuation 51 53 ; (3) the contralateral delay activity (CDA), a late sustained component indexing active item maintenance in the vWM buffer 39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What are the principles that guide this organization? One possibility is that it is the direct result of experience, critically dependent on the individual's life experiences and expertise (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)). An alternative is that experience merely modulates an already existing innately determined structure, driven by connectivity constraints (4,(18)(19)(20)(21) between regions within the occipito-temporal cortex and downstream areas specialized in processing specific object types.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we observed increased neural co-activation when participants formed impressions of high-SES (vs. low-SES) faces in a broadly distributed network consisting of frontoparietal and insular brain regions, inferior/superior temporal regions, cingulate cortex, and cerebellum, together with extensive co-activation in regions like the pons and midbrain (see Table 4 ). The regions constituting this network largely coincided with those involved in salience and attention 60 62 , possibly encompassed by more extended domain-general networks supporting focused task engagement 63 65 . We revisit this network in greater detail in the Discussion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%